Wainohu v New South Wales

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeFrench CJ,Kiefel J.,Gummow J,Gummow,Hayne,Crennan,Bell JJ.,Heydon J.
Judgment Date23 June 2011
Neutral Citation2011-0623 HCA B,[2011] HCA 24
CourtHigh Court
Docket NumberS164/2010
Date23 June 2011
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
98 cases
  • Public Service Association of South Australia Inc. v Industrial Relations Commission (SA)
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 11 July 2012
    ...error including breaches of the obligation to give procedural fairness.’ 109 (emphasis added) 85 The second decision was Wainohu v New South Wales. It concerned a non-curial decision — a decision made pursuant to a New South Wales statute by a judge of the Supreme Court of New South Wales, ......
  • AVN20 v Federal Circuit Court of Australia
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 4 May 2020
    ...FCA 1243; 122 FCR 270 Waensila v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 32; 241 FCR 121 Wainohu v New South Wales [2011] HCA 24; 243 CLR 181 Walton v Gardiner [1993] HCA 77; 177 CLR 378 Werrin v Commonwealth [1938] HCA 3; 59 CLR 150 Wong v Minister for Immigration & Mul......
  • Moti v The Queen
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 7 December 2011
    ...Torres Strait Islander Affairs (1996) 189 CLR 1 at 12, 1 4–16, 21–22, 24–26, 28, 46 and 49; [1996] HCA 18; Wainohu v New South Wales (2011) 243 CLR 181 at 201 [29], 205–206 [38], 225–226 [94]; [2011] HCA 169Thomas v Mowbray (2007) 233 CLR 307 at 432 [357] and 478 [512]; [2007] HCA 33. 170C......
  • Momcilovic v The Queen
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 8 September 2011
    ...an interpretative power which when exercised by courts is not offensive to the Kable principle as applied in recent cases including Wainohu v New South Wales248. In particular, s 32 does not confer upon the courts a law-making function of a character which is repugnant to the exercise of ju......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • High Court says, on your bike!
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 10 October 2011
    ...Wainohu v New South Wales (2011) 278 ALR 1, the High Court of Australia declared invalid legislation enacted by the New South Wales Parliament to target organised criminal groups, in particular "bikie" groups that had been the subject of significant media attention in The Crimes (Control of......
34 books & journal articles
  • Mandatory sentencing for people smuggling: issues of law and policy.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 36 No. 2, August 2012
    • 1 August 2012
    ...plea bargaining, exposing defendants to different minimum penalties. (300) Ibid 355 [57] (French CJ). (301) Wainohu v New South Wales (2011) 243 CLR 181; South Australia v Totani (2010) 242 CLR (302) See, eg, Evidence to Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee, Parliam......
  • The principle of open justice and the judicial duty to give public reasons.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 38 No. 2, December - December 2014
    • 1 December 2014
    ...the Constitution: Assistant Commissioner Condon v Pompano Pty Ltd (2013) 295 ALR 638, 659 [67] (French CJ); Wainohu v New South Wales (2011) 243 CLR 181, 208 [44] (French CJ and Kiefel J) ('Wainohu'); Hogan v Hinch (2011) 243 CLR 506, 530 [20] (French CJ). It is also seen as a defining feat......
  • Tiptoeing through the Tripwires: Recent Developments in Jurisdictional Error
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 44-3, September 2016
    • 1 September 2016
    ...review in that 324 Young and Murray, above n 19, 131. 325 (2012) 246 CLR 636, 666 (footnotes removed). 326 (2010) 242 CLR 1. 327 (2011) 243 CLR 181. 328 Young and Murray, above n 19, 137. 329 Bateman, above n 31, 490, 503–4. 330 Justice Steven Rares, ‘Judicial Review of Administrative Decis......
  • Attributes and Attribution of State Courts — Federalism and the Kable Principle
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 40-1, March 2012
    • 1 March 2012
    ...240 CLR 319; Kirk v Industrial Court (NSW) (2010) 239 CLR 531; South Australia v Totani (2010) 242 CLR 1; and Wainohu v New South Wales (2011) 243 CLR 181. It also prompts an analysis of a contemporaneous evolution in the constitutional policy of the Commonwealth, whose Attorney-General typ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT