Waters v Widdows
| Jurisdiction | Victoria |
| Date | 1984 |
| Court | Supreme Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
-
Dresdner Bank Aktiengesellschaft and Others v Ho Mun-Tuke Don and Another
...debt in its business without in any way being accountable to the debenture holder for such proceeds. The second case is Waters v Widdows [1984] VR 503 which is an authority directly in point. In that case, a company created a fixed charge over certain of its assets and a floating charge ove......
-
Chase Manhattan Bank NA v Wong Tui Sun and Others
... ... We need hardly add that the labels used in an instrument are not conclusive. In Hart v Barnes 10 and Waters v Widdows ,11 despite the fact that the relevant instruments expressly provided that there were to be fixed and specific charges, the courts were ... ...
-
Beggasa Ltd ((in Receivership))
...para. 15–71). A similar approach appears to have been adopted in other common law jurisdictions (see, for one example, Waters v. Widdows [1984] VR 503). 69 . In those circumstances it is not necessary to engage in detail with arguments around the debenture or s. 24(8) as, if they do not app......
-
Re City Securities Pte
...Siebe Gorman v Barclays Bank [1979] 2 Lloyd's Rep 142 (distd) Toomer, In re; ex parte Blaiberg (1883) 23 Ch D 254 (refd) Waters v Windows [1984] VR 503 (refd) Wrightson v McArthur & Hutchinsons [1921] 2 KB 807 (refd) Yolland, Husson & Birkett,In re [1908] 1 Ch 152 (refd) Yorkshire Woolcombe......
Request a trial to view additional results