Weinstock v Beck

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeFrench CJ.,Hayne,Crennan,Kiefel JJ.,Gageler J.
Judgment Date01 May 2013
Neutral Citation[2013] HCA 14
Docket NumberS266/2012,S56/2012
CourtHigh Court
Date01 May 2013
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
50 cases
2 firm's commentaries
  • Redeemable Preference Shares
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 16 December 2013
    ...created. Case law The question of what is a redeemable preference share was considered by the High Court in the case of Weinstock v Beck [2013] HCA 14, which was on appeal from the New South Wales Court of Appeal. One of the issues to be determined in the initial proceedings in Beck v Weins......
  • Corporate governance: High Court confirms its power to correct director's innocent mistakes
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 27 June 2013
    ...to corporate governance and has unanimously confirmed the breadth of the Court's power to correct such mistakes. Weinstock v Beck ([2013] HCA 14) concerned a family business, L W Furniture Consolidated (Aust) Pty Ltd (LWC), and a shareholder application challenging the purported appointment......
1 books & journal articles
  • The Proceduralisation of Australian Corporate Law
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 43-2, June 2015
    • 1 June 2015
    ...The New South Wales Henry George Foundation Ltd v Booth (2002) 41 ACSR 288; NRMA Ltd v Bradley (2002) 42 ACSR 616; Weinstock v Beck (2013) 251 CLR 396. 63 See especially Gunther Teubner, 'Corporate Fiduciary Duties and their Beneficiaries' in Klaus J Hopt and Gunther Teubner (eds), Corporat......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT