Weiss v R
Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
Court | High Court |
Judge | Gleeson CJ,Gummow,Kirby,Hayne,Callinan,Heydon JJ. |
Judgment Date | 15 December 2005 |
Neutral Citation | 2005-1215 HCA B,[2005] HCA 81 |
Date | 15 December 2005 |
Docket Number | M50/2005 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
229 cases
-
R v Kenneth James Noye
...the impact of fresh evidence on the safety of a conviction. Miss Montgomery did however go further and drew attention to Weiss v R [2005] HCA 81, and R v Mantenga [2009] NZSC 18, the first a decision of the High Court of Australia, and the second a decision of the Supreme Court of New Zeala......
-
R v Hillier(68)
...171 CLR 432 at 443-444. 29 Chidiac (1991) 171 CLR 432 at 443, 451, 458, 461-462. 30 (2002) 209 CLR 203 . 31 See Weiss v The Queen (2005) 224 CLR 300. 32 (2002) 209 CLR 203 at 217-220 [32]–[39]. 33 Balenzuela v De Gail (1959) 101 CLR 226 at 234-235. 34 (1960) 105 CLR 279 . 35 (1960) 105 CLR ......
-
R v Tang
...190–3. 98 Reasons of Gleeson CJ at para. 35. 99 These reasons above at paras. 80–2. 100Tang at paras. 195–7. 101 Compare Weiss v. RUNK(2005) 224 CLR 300; 223 ALR 662; [2005] HCA 81 at paras. 45–6. See also AK v. Western AustraliaUNK(2008) 243 ALR 409; 82 ALJR 534; [2008] HCA 8 at para. 59 p......
-
Batistatos v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales
...City Link Ltd (2001) 208 CLR 167 at 184–185 [54]; The Commonwealth v Yarmirr (2001) 208 CLR 1 at 111–112 [249]; Weiss v The Queen (2005) 80 ALJR 444 at 447–448 [9], 452 [31]; 223 ALR 662 at 664, 170 Constitution, s 73. See also s 74. 171Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 78B. 172 (1986) 12 FCR 267......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
Subject Index
...(Admin) . . 278,293Watson vMcEwen [1905] AC480 . . . . . . . . . . . 101Waugh vKippen (1986) 160CLR 156 . . . . . . . . 137Weiss vR [2005] HCA81 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163Westinghouse Electric Corp. Uranium ContractLitigation MDL Docket No. 235 (Nos 1 and 2)[1978]AC 547 . . .......
-
Re-evaluating the Collateral Challenge in the Era of Statutory Interpretation
...v Attorney-General (Qld) (2011) 242 CLR 573, 592 [43] (French CJ, Gummow, Hayne, Crennan, Kiefel and Bell JJ). 91. Weiss v The Queen (2005) 224 CLR 300, 312–3 (Gleeson CJ, Gummow, Kirby, Hayne, Callinan and Heydon JJ).92. Alcan (NT) Alumina Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Territory Revenue (NT) (......
-
Noticeboard
...JJ) Most Australian jurisdictions have a statutory provision like New Zealand’s s. 385(1)(a). The current Australian test (see Weiss v R [2005] HCA 81) is whether reasonable jury ought to have had a reasonable doubt which is essentially the New Zealand test. Australian courts, however, as a......
-
Case Commentaries
...appellate court must itself feel sure of thedefendant’s guilt. This mirrors the approach of the High Court of Australia whichin Weiss vR(2005) 224 CLR 300 said that the appeal court should not try to predictwhat a jury might or might not have done had there been no miscarriage ofjustice.The......