Westfield Management Ltd v AMP Capital Property Nominees Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judge | Heydon J. |
| Judgment Date | 05 December 2012 |
| Neutral Citation | [2012] HCA 54,2012-1205 HCA B |
| Court | High Court |
| Docket Number | S181/2012 |
| Date | 05 December 2012 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Karpik v Carnival plc (The Ruby Princess) (Stay Application)
...171 CLR 538 Wallis v Princess Cruises, Inc 306 F 3d 827 (9th Cir, 2002) Westfield Management Ltd v AMP Capital Property Nominees Ltd [2012] HCA 54; 247 CLR 129 Australian Law Reform Commission, Grouped Proceedings in the Federal Court (Report No 46, 1988) Davies M, Bell AS, Brereton PLG and......
-
Carnival plc v Karpik (The Ruby Princess)
...Power Board v Australian Mutual Provident Society [1934] HCA 3; 50 CLR 581 Westfield Management Ltd v AMP Capital Property Nominees Ltd [2012] HCA 54; 247 CLR 129 Wigmans v AMP Ltd (2010) 388 ALR 272 Wilh. Wilhelmsen Investments Pty Ltd v SSS Holdings Pty Ltd (2019) 285 IR 390 Worldplay Ser......
-
Epic Games, Inc v Apple Inc (Stay Application)
...HCA 11; 200 CLR 591 Voth v Manildra Flour Mills Pty Ltd (1990) 171 CLR 538 Westfield Management Ltd v AMP Capital Property Nominees Ltd [2012] HCA 54; 247 CLR 129 Davies M, ‘A Curate’s Egg: Good in Parts – Akai Pty Ltd v People’s Insurance Co Ltd’ (1997) 25 ABLR 215 Garnett R, ‘Jurisdiction......
-
Wellington Capital Ltd v Australian Securities and Investment Commission
...Management Ltd v AMP Capital Property Nominees Ltd (2012) 247 CLR 129 at 135–136 [10]–[12] per French CJ, Crennan, Kiefel and Bell JJ; [2012] HCA 54. 7 Paragraph (b) of the definition picks up time-sharing schemes and pars (c)–(n) set out a number of exclusions from the definition, none of ......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
Australian High Court refuses to allow 'contracting out' of managed investment scheme statutory rights
...Westfield Management Limited v AMP Capital Property Nominees Limited [2012] HCA 54, the High Court has cast doubt over the extent to which parties may 'contract out' of the statutory protections afforded to members of registered managed investment schemes (MIS) under Chapter 5C of the Corpo......
-
Managed Investment Schemes - Contracting Out of Rights conferred by Legislation
...Overview the decision of Westfield Management Limited v AMP Capital Property Nominees Limited [2012] HCA 54, the High Court concluded that members of a managed investment scheme cannot bargain away the rights conferred by Chapter 5C of the Corporations The decision concerned a dispute betwe......