William Thomas Law(Appellant) v Christopher Ilievski (First Respondent)

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory
CourtSupreme Court of ACT
JudgeRefshauge ACJ
Judgment Date12 October 2016
Docket NumberFile Number: SCA 35 of 2016
Date12 October 2016
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 cases
  • Christopher John Miles(Appellant) v The Queen
    • Australia
    • Court of Appeal of ACT
    • 14 October 2016
    ...; 248 CLR 483 Hili v The Queen ; Jones v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 House v The King [1936] HCA 40 ; 55 CLR 499 Law v Ilievski [2016] ACTSC 291 Lowe v The Queen [1984] HCA 46 ; 154 CLR 606 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25 ; 228 CLR 357 Miles v The Queen [2014] ACTCA 41 Mill v T......
  • Adam Amos(Appellant) v Theresia McCarron, Roger Neville Watts and Suzanne Marie White
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court of ACT
    • 19 January 2017
    ...v The Queen [2004] HCA 15 ; 205 ALR 346 Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37 ; 252 CLR 601 King v Mainey [2008] ACTSC 108 Law v Ilievski [2016] ACTSC 291 Mill v The Queen (1986) 166 CLR 59 Moutrage v Haines [2008] ACTSC 36 Quzag v The Queen (No 2) [2016] ACTCA 27 Rees v The Queen [2012] ACTCA......
  • Isa Islam(Appellant) v The Queen
    • Australia
    • Court of Appeal of ACT
    • 24 March 2017
    ...claims should be dealt with. See also Celeska v Langlands [2014] ACTSC 211, at [10], and the comments of Refshauge J in Law v Ilievski [2016] ACTSC 291 at [23] to [26]. 21 Since 2007, the Victorian Court of Appeal has revisited the approach taken by Maxwell P in R v Abbott [2007] VSCA 32; 1......
  • The Queen(Crown) v Michael Paul Forrest (Accused)
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court of ACT
    • 27 August 2017
    ...Central Authority [2000] HCA 17 ; 201 CLR 226 J by his litigation guardian Vardanega v ACT [2009] ACTSC 170 ; 234 FLR 399 Law v Ilievski [2016] ACTSC 291 Lowe v Visser [1988] Tas R 17 Millard v The Queen (No 2) [2016] ACTCA 41 O'Connell v The Queen (1844) 11 Cl & F 155 ; 8 ER 1061 Pearce v ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT