Williams v R

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation2000-1220 FCA H
Year2000
Date2000
CourtFederal Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 cases
  • R v Green (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court of ACT
    • 14 Mayo 2019
    ...[2002] NSWCCA 509; 56 NSWLR 182 R v YL [2004] ACTSC 115; 187 FLR 84 Sio v The Queen [2016] HCA 32; 259 CLR 47 Williams v The Queen [2000] FCA 1868; 119 A Crim R 490 Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (ACT) s 28 Evidence Act 2011 (ACT) ss 65, 67, 135, 136, 137, 138, 165 Evidence (Miscellaneo......
  • R v Campbell (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court of ACT
    • 30 Abril 2019
    ...HCA 32; 259 CLR 47 Tasmania v Dolega [2016] TASSC 65; 26 Tas R 312 Walton v The Queen [1989] HCA 9; 166 CLR 283 Williams v The Queen [2000] FCA 1868; 119 A Crim R 490 Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 2011 (ACT) ss 65, 67, 165 EVIDENCE — Admissibility and Relevancy — Witnesses — hearsay — exc......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Whither, hither and thither, Res Gestae? A comparative analysis of its relevance and application
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 25-4, October 2021
    • 1 Octubre 2021
    ...asserted fact occurred and in circumstances that make it unlikely that the representation is a fabrication’;seealso Williams vThe Queen [2000] FCA 1868 at [46].64. HML vThe Queen [2008] HCA 16 at [496].65. Conway vThe Queen [2000] FCA 461 at [133].338 The International Journal of Evidence &......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT