Williams v Spautz

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1992-0727 HCA A,[1992] HCA 34
Date1992
Year1992
CourtHigh Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
540 cases
4 books & journal articles
  • Prosecutorial Discretion and Judicial Review: An Analysis of Recent Canadian and South African Decisions
    • South Africa
    • Sabinet Southern African Public Law No. 35-2, July 2020
    • 1 July 2020
    ...16) para 49. 49 Kriege r (n 16) para 49. 50 Nixon (n 16) para 64. 51 ibi d para 68. 52 Anderson (n 16) para 50. 53 Wil liams v Spautz (1992) 174 CLR 509 (HCA) where the respondent had commenced over thirty proceedings, the majority of which were, criminal prosecutions, against persons who o......
  • Tort Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2017, December 2017
    • 1 December 2017
    ...404. 65 [2017] SGHC 121. 66 See paras 26.77–26.78 and paras 26.151–26.152 below. 67 (1904) 91 LT 816. 68 [2014] AC 366 at [149]. 69 (1992) 174 CLR 509 at 537. 70 Lee Tat Development Pte Ltd v Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 301 [2017] SGHC 121 at [35]. 71 [1996] 2 SLR(R) 858. 72......
  • Tort Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2018, December 2018
    • 1 December 2018
    ...below. 48 See para 26.120 below. 49 [2016] 3 WLR 477. 50 [2013] 3 WLR 927. 51 (1838) 4 Bing NC 212. 52 (1861) 10 CBNS 592. 53 (1992) 107 ALR 635. 54 See, eg, Savill v Roberts (1698) 12 Mod Rep 208, per Holt CJ, and The Walter D Wallet [1893] PD 202. 55 Lee Tat Development Pte Ltd v Manageme......
  • KNIGHT GLENN JEYASINGAM V PP A MATTER OF FIRST PRINCIPLES
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1998, December 1998
    • 1 December 1998
    ...462 illustrates that in appropriate situations, the Public Prosecutor’s power under Article 35(8) must give way to judicial power. 8 (1992) 107 ALR 635 at 640. This was a case where Dr Spautz commenced 30 proceedings, the majority being criminal prosecutions, against persons who occupied po......