Wilton v Farnworth
Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
Neutral Citation | [1948] HCA 20,1948-0914 HCA B |
Date | 1948 |
Year | 1948 |
Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
33 cases
-
Toll (Fgct) Pty Ltd v Alphapharm Pty Ltd
...agreement itself to prove that the defendant has assented to it.’ 43 More recently, in words that are apposite to the present case, in Wilton v Farnworth10 Latham CJ said: ‘In the absence of fraud or some other of the special circumstances of the character mentioned, a man cannot escape the......
-
Prendergast v Joyce
...April, 1987). O'Rorke v. Bolingbroke [1876-1877] 2 App. Cas. 814. Provincial Bank v. McKeever [1941] 1 I.R. 471. Wilton v. Farnworth (1948) 76 C.L.R. 646. Equity - Undue influence - Improvident transaction - Whether presumption of undue influence arose - Whether presumption rebutted - Wheth......
-
Howell Evans and Others v David Edward Rees Lloyd and Another
..."appears to be particularly vigorous" ( Lawrence v Poorah, at para 20), see the decisions of the High Court of Australia in Wilton v Farnworth (1948) 76 C.L.R. 646 and Louth v Diprose (1992) 175 C.L.R. 621. For the Republic of Ireland, see Prendergast v Joyce [2009] IEHC 199, where Langton ......
- Cohen v iSoft Group Pty Ltd
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
THE UNCONSCIONABLE BARGAINS DOCTRINE IN ENGLAND AND AUSTRALIA: COUSINS OR SIBLINGS?
...properly so-called, is necessary; for example, the doctrine can be used to set aside unilateral gifts: see, eg, Wilton vFarnworth (1948) 76 CLR 646 (2) See, eg, Boustany v Pigott (1995) 69 P & CR 298, 303 (Lord Templeman) ('Boustany'); Credit Lyonnais Bank Nederland NV v Export Credit G......
-
SINGAPORE ACADEMY OF LAW ANNUAL LECTURE 2007: “AUSTRALIA’S CONTRIBUTION TO THE COMMON LAW”
...Bank Ltd[1982] QB 84; Gillett v Holt[2001] Ch 210; National Westminster Bank plc v Somer International (UK) Ltd[2002] QB 1286. 23 (1948) 76 CLR 646. 24 (1956) 99 CLR 362. 25 (1983) 151 CLR 447 (“Amadio”). 26 Moffatt v Moffatt [1984] 1 NZLR 600; Nichols v Jessup[1986] 1 NZLR 226; Bowkert v A......