Wong v Silkfield Pty Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | 1998-1120 FCA L |
| Date | 1998 |
| Year | 1998 |
| Court | Federal Court |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
61 cases
- Wingecarribee Shire Council v Lehman Brothers Australia Ltd (in Liquidation)
- Pharm-A-Care Laboratories Pty Ltd v Commonwealth of Australia (No 3)
-
Campbells Cash and Carry Pty Ltd v Fostif Pty Ltd
...former Chancery practice 25. The former Chancery practice with respect to representative proceedings was considered by this Court in Wong v Silkfield Pty Ltd26. 43 The former Chancery practice was governed by two principles. The first was that all persons materially interested in the subjec......
- Murphy v Overton Investments Pty Ltd
Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
-
Federal Court Of Australia Rejects 'Common Fund' For Litigation Funders
...The Owners of the Ship "Shin Kobe Maru" v Empire Shipping Company Inc (1994) 181 CLR 404 at 421; Wong v Silkfield Pty Limited (1999) 199 CLR 255 at 2 Blairgowrie Trading Ltd v Allco Finance Group Ltd (Receivers & Managers Appointed) (In Liq) [2015] FCA 811 at [113]. 3 Blairgowrie Tradin......
-
Class Actions In Australia - 2014 In Review
...indicate a large or significant issue but instead is "directed to issues which are 'real or of substance'": Wong v Silkfield Pty Ltd (1999) 199 CLR 255 at It is to be expected that larger, less cohesive class actions are now able to be brought. If this occurs, then the resulting class actio......
4 books & journal articles
-
The South African Class Action vs Group Action as an appropriate procedural device
...47 P Cashman Cl ass Action Law and Pr actice (20 07) 311-312.48 1998 ATPR 41-613, 40, 726 approved in Wong v Silkfie ld Pty Ltd (1999) 199 CLR 255, 33.49 2005 VSC 306.CLASS ACTION VS GROUP ACTION AS A PROCEDURAL DEVICE 13© Juta and Company (Pty) has not prevented court s from allowing the c......
-
CERAMIC FUEL CELLS LTD (IN LIQ) V MCGRAW-HILL FINANCIAL INC: ACCESSING THIRD PARTY DOCUMENTS IN A FOREIGN JURISDICTION BY SUBPOENA.
...v Commonwealth (1945) 70 CLR 60, 68 (Latham CJ). (31) Ibid, citing The Shin Kobe Maru (1994) 181 CLR 404, 421; Wong v Silkfield Pty Ltd (1999) 199 CLR 255. (32) Ceramic Fuel Cells (n 2) 353 (33) Ibid. (34) Ibid 116 [63], citing: Blairgowrie Trading Ltd v Allco Finance Group Ltd (recs and mg......
-
AN ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVE ON COSTS IN AUSTRALIAN CLASS ACTIONS.
...is consistent with Boardman (n 127) 104 (Lord Cohen), 112 (Lord Hudson). (141) FCA Act (n 16) s 33T(1). (142) Wong v Silkfield Pty Ltd (1999) 199 CLR 255, 266 [25] (Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Gummow, Kirby and Callinan JJ). (143) FCA Act (n 16) s 33T allows a court to 'make such other orders as it......
-
CLOSING THE COURTHOUSE DOOR? AVOIDING CLASS ACTIONS THROUGH ARBITRATION CLAUSES IN AUSTRALIA.
...for the Benefit of the Clients of the Class Representative's Solicitors' (2007) 29(1) Sydney Law Review 5, 7; Wong v Silkfield Pty Ltd (1999) 199 CLR 255, 266 [26] (Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Gummow, Kirby and Callinan (26) See Australian Law Reform Commission, Integrity, Fairness and Efficiency: ......