Woolcock Street Investments Pty Ltd v Cdg Pty Ltd
Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
Court | High Court |
Judge | Gleeson CJ,Gummow,Hayne,Heydon JJ.,McHugh J.,Kirby J.,Callinan J. |
Judgment Date | 01 April 2004 |
Neutral Citation | 2004-0401 HCA A,[2004] HCA 16 |
Docket Number | B19/2003 |
Date | 01 April 2004 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
159 cases
10 firm's commentaries
-
Cladding design in high rise buildings: rethinking the approach
...cases would make hard for owners/subsequent purchasers to recover economic loss - Woolcock Street Investments Pty Ltd v CDG Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 16; Brookfield Multiplex Ltd v Owners Corporation Strata Plan 61288(2014) 313 ALR 408; [2014] HCA 3; Chan v Acres [2015] NSWSC 1885; Tzaneros Invest......
-
Construction & Infrastructure - What's News - 19 August 2014
...by building surveyor – Perre v Apand Pty Ltd [1999] HCA 36; (1999) 198 CLR 180 – Woolcock Street Investments Pty Ltd v CDG Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 16; (2004) 216 CLR 515. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Pleadings – Amendment – Amendment after close of evidence – Whether amendment relates back to date o......
-
Duty of Care and the 'Salient Features' Test
...consulted the decisions of the High Court in Bryan v Maloney [1995] HCA 17 and Woolcock Street Investments Pty Limited v CDG Pty Limited [2004] HCA 16 (Woolcock). In Bryan v Maloney, inadequate footings in a residential house caused subsequent cracking of the structure. This was held not to......
-
Liability of builders to be reviewed by the High Court
...out negligently. A decision is likely to be handed down by the end of the year. Footnotes 1Woolcock Street Investments v CDG Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 16 2Owners - Strata Plan No 61288 v Brookfield Australia Investments Ltd ([2013] NSWCA The content of this article is intended to provide a general......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
-
The Australian High Court and Social Facts: A Content Analysis Study
...(2002) 211 CLR 317, 430 [335] (Callinan J), 335 [26] (Gleeson CJ). 84 For example, Woolcock Street Investments Pty Ltd v CDG Pty Ltd (2004) 216 CLR 515, 528 [17] (Gleeson CJ, Gummow, Hayne and Heydon JJ), 549–50 [81]–[87] (McHugh J), 552–3 [95]–[96] (McHugh J), 554 [100] (McHugh J), 555 [10......
-
Mandatory sentencing for people smuggling: issues of law and policy.
...358-60 (O'Connor J); Eastman v The Queen (2000) 203 CLR 1, 41-2 [134] (McHugh J); Woolcock Street Investments Pty Ltd v CDG Pty Ltd (2004) 216 CLR 515, 569 [150] (Kirby J); New South Wales v Commonwealth (2006) 229 CLR 1, 369 [885] (Callinan J) ('Work Choices (383) (2011) 255 FLR 80, 91 [46......
-
THE PROMISE OF UNIVERSALITY
...AC 923 at 940. 130[2010] EWCA Civ 13. 131Bhamra v Dubb[2010] EWCA Civ 13 at [25]. 132Woolcock Street Investments Pty Ltd v CDG Pty Ltd(2004) 216 CLR 515 at 550. 133(2000) 205 CLR 254. 134Modbury Triangle Shopping Centre Pty Ltd v Anzil(2000) 205 CLR 254 at 266. 135See Toh Siew Kee v Ho Ah L......
-
Tort Law
...declined to extend Bryan v MaloneyUNK(1995) 182 CLR 609 to commercial properties (Woolcock Street Investments Pty Ltd v CDG Pty LtdUNK(2004) 216 CLR 515). 23.35 Xu Ren Li v Nakano Singapore (Pte) Ltd[2012] 1 SLR 729 was an appeal by a claimant who had suffered a work place injury and had hi......
Request a trial to view additional results