Woolworths Ltd v Bp Plc

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[2006] FCAFC 132,2006-0904 FCA C,2006-0421 FCA G,[2006] FCAFC 52
Date2006
Year2006
CourtFull Federal Court (Australia)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
30 cases
  • Henley Arch Pty Ltd v Henley Constructions Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 5 November 2021
    ...any building and construction services in respect of which that sign is used. Henley Arch submits that in Woolworths Ltd v BP plc (No 2) [2006] FCAFC 132; (2006) 154 FCR 97 at [77], the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) (per Heerey, Allsop (as the Chief Justice then ......
  • Pfizer Products Inc. v Karam
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Suyen Corporation v Americana International Ltd (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Goodman Fielder Pte Ltd v Conga Foods Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 17 December 2020
    ...Telstra Corporation Limited v Phone Directories Company Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FCAFC 156; 237 FCR 388 Woolworths Ltd v BP plc (No 2) [2006] FCAFC 132; 154 FCR 97 Woolworths Ltd v BP plc [2006] FCAFC 132; 154 FCR 97 Burrell R and Handler M, Australian Trade Mark Law (2nd ed, Oxford Univers......
  • Get Started for Free
3 firm's commentaries
  • Apple not appy with Federal Court decision on APP STORE trade mark
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 15 April 2015
    ...Societe Des Produits Nestle SA v Unilever plc [2003] RPC 35 and Woolworths Ltd v BP plc (No 2) (2006) 154 FCR 97; 235 ALR 698; [2006] FCAFC 132; BC200606912 were all cited in the judgement, and held to be applicable to this case despite the fact that the latter three cases concerned the cap......
  • Cantarella Bros Pty Ltd v Lavazza Australia Pty Ltd ' How to determine "ordinary signification" of trademark
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 6 November 2023
    ...citing Johnson & Johnson Australia Pty Ltd v Sterling Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd (1991) 30 FCR 326, 347-8; Woolworths Ltd v BP plc (No 2) [2006] FCAFC 132 [77]; Self Care IP Holdings Pty Ltd v Allergan Australia Pty Ltd [2023] HCA 8 7 Ibid [347] citing Johnson & Johnson Australia Pty Ltd v Ste......
  • Green Marks, Purple Minds: Protecting Your Colour
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 19 July 2007
    ...suggest that consumer protection laws provide the most viable mechanism for businesses to lay claim to colour. In Woolworths -v- BP [2006] FCAFC 132, the primary issue was whether BP's use of the colour green as the predominant colour in association with service stations would support the r......