Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Australia | 1-800-335-6202

Woolworths Ltd v Bp Plc

Cited authorities 32 Cited in 33 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[2006] FCAFC 132,2006-0904 FCA C,2006-0421 FCA G,[2006] FCAFC 52
Date2006
Year2006
CourtFull Federal Court (Australia)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
30 cases
  • Pfizer Products Inc. v Karam
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Henley Arch Pty Ltd v Henley Constructions Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 5 Noviembre 2021
    ...any building and construction services in respect of which that sign is used. Henley Arch submits that in Woolworths Ltd v BP plc (No 2) [2006] FCAFC 132; (2006) 154 FCR 97 at [77], the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) (per Heerey, Allsop (as the Chief Justice then ......
  • Suyen Corporation v Americana International Ltd (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Goodman Fielder Pte Ltd v Conga Foods Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 17 Diciembre 2020
    ...Telstra Corporation Limited v Phone Directories Company Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FCAFC 156; 237 FCR 388 Woolworths Ltd v BP plc (No 2) [2006] FCAFC 132; 154 FCR 97 Woolworths Ltd v BP plc [2006] FCAFC 132; 154 FCR 97 Burrell R and Handler M, Australian Trade Mark Law (2nd ed, Oxford Univers......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries
  • Apple not appy with Federal Court decision on APP STORE trade mark
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 15 Abril 2015
    ...Societe Des Produits Nestle SA v Unilever plc [2003] RPC 35 and Woolworths Ltd v BP plc (No 2) (2006) 154 FCR 97; 235 ALR 698; [2006] FCAFC 132; BC200606912 were all cited in the judgement, and held to be applicable to this case despite the fact that the latter three cases concerned the cap......
  • Cantarella Bros Pty Ltd v Lavazza Australia Pty Ltd ' How to determine "ordinary signification" of trademark
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 6 Noviembre 2023
    ...citing Johnson & Johnson Australia Pty Ltd v Sterling Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd (1991) 30 FCR 326, 347-8; Woolworths Ltd v BP plc (No 2) [2006] FCAFC 132 [77]; Self Care IP Holdings Pty Ltd v Allergan Australia Pty Ltd [2023] HCA 8 7 Ibid [347] citing Johnson & Johnson Australia Pty Ltd v Ste......
  • Green Marks, Purple Minds: Protecting Your Colour
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 19 Julio 2007
    ...suggest that consumer protection laws provide the most viable mechanism for businesses to lay claim to colour. In Woolworths -v- BP [2006] FCAFC 132, the primary issue was whether BP's use of the colour green as the predominant colour in association with service stations would support the r......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT