Wright v Cedzich
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | [1930] HCA 4,1930-0319 HCA A |
| Year | 1930 |
| Date | 1930 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 cases
-
Magill v Magill
...as 1876, was the fundamental and general principle of the common law that spouses ‘are one person’ 34. In his dissenting judgment in Wright v Cedzich35, Isaacs J spoke with evident approval of Bentham's criticism of the use of such a ‘quibble’ as the ‘nonsensical reason’ for legal propositi......
- Attorney-General (Nsw) v Perpetual Trustee Company (Ltd)
-
Csr Ltd v Eddy
...added). 180 Sullivan v Gordon (1999) 47 NSWLR 319 . 181 Randall v Dul (1994) 13 WAR 205 . 182 Sturch v Willmott [1997] 2 Qd R 310 . 183 (1930) 43 CLR 493 184 [1952] AC 716 . 185 [1952] AC 716 at 728. 186 Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1941 (WA), s 3; Law Reform (Marital Consortiu......
-
Slivak v Lurgi (Australia) Pty Ltd
...33 gives to the wife an action for loss of consortium. At common law, the action lay only at the suit of the husband: Wright v Cedzich (1930) 43 CLR 493. The action is independent of any cause of action by the injured spouse against the defendant: Curran v Young (1965) 112 CLR 2 (1999) 203 ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Reasoning with the Foundations of Rules
...legislation as a ‘significant’ statutory development: PGA (2012) 245 CLR 355, 384 [62]. 86 Ibid 384 [63], quoting Wright v Cedzich (1930) 43 CLR 493, 505. 87 The majority also raised a third possibility, which is that the English ecclesiastical courts’ recognition of an ‘obligation not to r......