X7 v Australian Crime Commission
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judge | French CJ,Crennan J.,Hayne,Bell JJ.,Kiefel J. |
| Judgment Date | 26 June 2013 |
| Neutral Citation | 2013-0626 HCA A,[2013] HCA 29 |
| Court | High Court |
| Docket Number | S100/2012 |
| Date | 26 June 2013 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
128 cases
-
New Health New Zealand Incorporated v South Taranaki District Council
...v Lord Chancellor, ex parte Witham [1998] QB 575 (QB). It was applied by the High Court of Australia in X7 v Australian Crime Commission [2013] HCA 29, (2013) 248 CLR 92 and by three members of the Court of Appeal in R v Pora [2001] 2 NZLR 37 approach that “[f]undamental rights cannot be ov......
-
New Health New Zealand Inc. v South Taranaki District Council and another
...v Lord Chancellor, ex parte Witham [1998] QB 575 (QB). It was applied by the High Court of Australia in X7 v Australian Crime Commission [2013] HCA 29, (2013) 248 CLR 92 and by three members of the Court of Appeal in R v Pora [2001] 2 NZLR 37 (CA). 328 R v Secretary of State for the Home D......
-
Hofer v The Queen
...329 at 333 [18]; 222 ALR 436 at 440-441. 5 (2005) 80 ALJR 329 at 333 [18]; 222 ALR 436 at 440-441. 6 X7 v Australian Crime Commission (2013) 248 CLR 92 at 136 [101], 153 [159]; Lee v New South Wales Crime Commission (2013) 251 CLR 196 at 212-213 [20], 249 [125], 261 7 MWJ v The Queen (2005)......
-
Tony Strickland (a pseudonym) v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions; Donald Galloway (a pseudonym) v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions; Edmund Hodges (a pseudonym) v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions; Rick Tucker (a pseudonym) v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions
...(Cth) v Galloway [2017] VSCA 120 at [270]–[271]. 39 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Galloway [2017] VSCA 120 at [285]–[289]. 40 (2013) 248 CLR 92 at 142–143 [124] (Kiefel J agreeing at 152 [157]); [2013] HCA 41 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Galloway [2017] VSCA 120 at [297......
Get Started for Free
4 firm's commentaries
-
Do NSW police have power to search the contents of a mobile phone without a search warrant?
...of the search may be excluded from any subsequent trial. Footnotes 1Coco v The Queen [1994] HCA 15; X7 v Australian Crime Commission [2013] HCA 29. 2 Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd (2001) 208 CLR 199; Grosse v Purvis [2003] QDC 151; Doe v Australian Broadcast......
-
Do NSW police have power to search the contents of a mobile phone without a search warrant?
...of the search may be excluded from any subsequent trial. Footnotes 1Coco v The Queen [1994] HCA 15; X7 v Australian Crime Commission [2013] HCA 29. 2 Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd (2001) 208 CLR 199; Grosse v Purvis [2003] QDC 151; Doe v Australian Broadcast......
-
Self incrimination, regulators and commissions do I really have to answer that question? Part 2
...Pty Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (Ruling on Discovery) [2015] VSC 352. 7 X7 v Australian Crime Commission (2013) 248 CLR 92, Lee v NSW Crime Commission (2013) 251 CLR 196 and Lee v R (2014) 253 CLR 455. 8 Re Bolton: Ex parte Beane [1987] HCA 12, Coco v The Queen [19......
-
Corporate crime understanding the playing field
...for Industry, Tourism & Resources v Mobil Oil Australia Pty Ltd (2004) ATPR 41-993 at 53 2 X7 v Australian Crime Commission (2013) 248 CLR 92 at 3 Pyneboard Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission (1983) 152 CLR 328 at 335 The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide ......
16 books & journal articles
-
A Comparison and Critique of Closed Court Hearings
...CRITIQUE OF CLOSED COURT HEARINGS21 Ibid. at 557 (French CJ, Gummow, Hayne, Crennan, Kiefel and Bell JJ); X7 vAustralian CrimeCommission [2013] HCA 29 at [101]: ‘the whole of the process for the investigation, prosecution andtrial of an indictable Commonwealth offence is accusatorial … in t......
-
Tiptoeing through the Tripwires: Recent Developments in Jurisdictional Error
...v Cunneen (2015) 256 CLR 1; A v Independent Commission Against Corruption (2014) 88 NSWLR 240; X7 v Australian Crime Commission (2013) 248 CLR 92. 41 Groves, Judicial Review, above n 19, 372. 42 Basten, above n 2, 95. See, eg, Ind ependent Commission against Corruption Amendment (Validation......
-
Indexes
.... . 322Woodland vHamilton 1990 JCSLT 565 . . . . . . 25Wright vTatham (1837) 112Eng Rep 488 . . . 181,186X7 v Australian Crime Commission [2013] HCA29 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235, 247Yap Giau Beng Terence v Public Prosecutor[1998]2 SLR(R) 855 . . . . . . ......
-
The Importance of Full and Frank Disclosure in Family Law Financial Proceedings and the Many Consequences of Non-Disclosure
...Kiefel, Bell, Keane and Gordon JJ). Cf Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 (UK) s 35. 38 See X7 v Australian Crime Commission (2013) 248 CLR 92, 121 [48] (French CJ and Crennan J); Lee v New South Wales Crime Commission (2013) 251 CLR 196, 259 [153] (Crennan J). 39 Cf Criminal Proced......
Get Started for Free