Yorkville Nominees Pty Ltd (in Liquidation) v Lissenden
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Court | High Court |
| Neutral Citation | 1986-0220 HCA E,[1986] HCA 6 |
| Year | 1986 |
| Date | 1986 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 cases
-
McAleenan v AIG (Europe) Ltd
...THAN MARINE 9ED 1997 PARA 17.28 P SAMUEL & CO LTD v DUMAS 1924 AC 431 1924 18 LL L LR 211 YORKVILLE NOMINEES PTY LTD v LISSENDEN 1985-86 160 CLR 475 1986 HCA 6 SUPERWOOD HOLDINGS PLC & ORS v SUN ALLIANCE & LONDON INSURANCE PLC (T/A SUN ALLIANCE INSURANCE GROUP) & ORS 1995 3 IR 303 1995/13/3......
- Arab Bank Plc v Zurich Insurance Company [QBD (Comm)]
-
Brokus v Brennan
...389; Cintana v Burgoyne (2003) 13 NTLR 130, 138; Coleman v Power (2004) 209 ALR 192; [2004] HCA 39; Crowe v Graham (1968) 121 CLR 375; [1986] HCA 6; Densley v Martin [1943] SASR 144; E (A Child) v Staats (1994) 76 A Crim R 343; Ellis v Fingleton [1972] 3 SASR 437; Hoessinger v R (1992) 62 A......
-
Framar Money Management Pty. Ltd v Territory Insurance Office; John Villias Kelton; Baillieu Bowring Marsh and McLennan Pty. Ltd
...Cas 671 Tramways Advertising Pty. Ltd. v Luna Park (NSW) Ltd. 38 SR (N.S.W.) 632 Yorkville Nominees Pty. Ltd. (In Liquidation) v Lissenden 63 ALR 611. Supreme Court Rules O.23 r.15. Costs — Plaintiff successful against one defendant, but unsuccessful against others — Whether a proper case f......