Young v Queensland Trustees Ltd

JurisdictionQueensland
Neutral Citation1956-0830 HCA B,[1956] HCA 51
CourtHigh Court
Year1956
Date1956

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
110 cases
  • McCARTHY v McINTYRE
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Mccarthy v Mcintyre
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Wee Yue Chew v Su Sh-Hsyu
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 7 April 2008
    ...plaintiff has. [emphasis added] 4 Specifically and by way of illustration, I turn to the decision of Young v Queensland Trustees Ltd (1956) 99 CLR 560 on the application of the rule on the legal burden of proof. That case was not about the characterisation of the arrangement between the par......
  • Hunt & Hunt Lawyers v Mitchell Morgan Nominees Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 3 April 2013
    ...Quinerts Pty Ltd (2009) 25 VR 666 at 689 [82]. 59 Mahony v J Kruschich (Demolitions) Pty Ltd (1985) 156 CLR 522 at 527. 60 See Young v Queensland Trustees Ltd (1956) 99 CLR 560 at 567, 569; [1956] HCA 51. 61 Stapley v Gypsum Mines Ltd [1953] AC 663 at 681, cited in March v Stramare (E......
  • Get Started for Free