Zippo Manufacturing Company v Jaxlawn Pty Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | 2011-0929 FCA A |
| Date | 2011 |
| Year | 2011 |
| Court | Federal Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
-
Matson v Attorney-General (No 2)
...of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth). The tests are identical, apart from s 31A(3): Zippo Manufacturing Co v Jaxlawn Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1125 at [20] (Gordon J). Even though it has no equivalent in r 26.01, it seems to me that s 31A(3) clarifies, but does not alter, the ordinary meaning of ......
-
Quach v Commissioner of Taxation
...(1921) 30 CLR 80 Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd v Kocak [2013] HCA 43; (2013) 252 CLR 480 Zippo Manufacturing Co v Jaxlawn Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1125 Date of hearing: 11 June 2019 Registry: Western Australia Division: General Division National Practice Arthe proceeding or that part of the......
-
Mineralogy Pty Ltd v Australian Securities and Investments Commission
...Court Act, rather than r 26.01 of the Rules, those “provisions contain identical tests”: Zippo Manufacturing Co v Jaxlawn Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1125 at [20] (Gordon J). The relevant inquiry is “not an enquiry directed to whether a certain and concluded determination could be made that the proc......
-
Nyamal Palyku Proceeding
...to fail) is not included in r 26.01, the section and the rule contain identical tests (see Zippo Manufacturing Co v Jaxlawn Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1125 at [20] per Gordon J and Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Cassimatis (2013) 220 FCR 256; [2013] FCA 641 at [13] per Reeves As......
Request a trial to view additional results