Znaty v Minister for Immigration
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judgment Date | 1972 |
| Neutral Citation | [1972] HCA 14,1972-0225 HCA D |
| Year | 1972 |
| Date | 1972 |
| Court | High Court |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
12 cases
-
Re Woolley; ex parte M276/2003 by Their Next Friend Gs
...(Canada) v Cain [1906] AC 542 at 546; Chu Shao Hung v The Queen (1953) 87 CLR 575 at 589 per Kitto J; Znaty v Minister for Immigration (1972) 126 CLR 1 at 9–10 per Walsh 25 (1992) 176 CLR 1 at 32. 26 Lim (1992) 176 CLR 1 at 10. 27 See R v Kirby; Ex parte Boilermakers' Society of Australia (......
-
Plaintiff M47-2012 v Director General of Security
...138 cf United Mexican States v Cabal (2001) 209 CLR 165 at 182–183 [44]; [2001] HCA 60. 139 (2004) 219 CLR 562 at 579–580 [27]. 140 (1972) 126 CLR 1 at 9 per Walsh J; [1972] HCA 14. 141 Barton v The Commonwealth (1974) 131 CLR 477 at 483–484, 503–504; [1974] HCA 20; Schlieske v Minister for......
- Perez v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
-
Plaintiff P1/2003 v Ruddock
...for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1999) 92 FCR 524 XYZ v Commonwealth (2006) 80 ALJR 1036 Znaty v Minister for Immigration (1972) 126 CLR 1 PLAINTIFF P1/2003 v PHILIP MAXWELL RUDDOCK FORMERLY THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS WAD 156 OF 2003 NICHOLSON J 7 Febru......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
DOES LIM TRULY HAVE 'NOTHING TO SAY' ABOUT THE COMMONWEALTH'S REGIONAL PROCESSING ARRANGEMENTS? HABEAS CORPUS AS A VEHICLE FOR TESTING THE CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY OF OFFSHORE DETENTION.
...quoting A-G (Canada) v Cain [1906] AC 542, 545 (Lord Atkinson for the Judicial Committee). See also Znaty v Minister for Immigration (1972) 126 CLR 1, 12 (Walsh J, McTiernan J agreeing at 3, Owen J agreeing at 4), quoted in Schlieske (n 347) 727 (Wilcox and French (351) Robtelmes (n 348) 41......