Adelaide Steamship Company Ltd v R
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | [1912] HCA 58,1912-0920 HCA A |
| Year | 1912 |
| Date | 1912 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Boral Besser Masonry Ltd (Now Boral Masonry Ltd) v Accc
...US 104 at 116 (1986). 36 R and the Attorney-General of the Commonwealth v Associated Northern Collieries (1911) 14 CLR 387 at 653 (revd (1912) 15 CLR 65, and affd [1913] AC 781). Isaacs J referred at length in his judgment ((1911) 14 CLR 387 at 396-667) to the decisions upon the Sherman 37 ......
- Minister of State for Home Affairs v Siam Polyethylene Company Ltd
-
Chief Executive Officer of Customs v El Hajje
... ... An employee of the truck hire company gave evidence of the hire of the truck ... 20 The respondent gave evidence ... problem was clearly on the mind of Griffith CJ delivering the judgment of this Court in Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd v The King , where his Honour reserved the point with these words 99 : ... ...
- Redfern v Dunlop Rubber Australia Ltd
3 books & journal articles
-
The Engineers Case Centenary: SCOTUS and the Origins of Australia's Scabrous Constitutional Signature
...was the interpretation of price fixing and bid rigging in relation to intention. The appeal decisions are Adelaide SS Co Ltd v The King (1912) 15 CLR 65 (Austl.) and Attorney-General (Cth) v Adelaide SS Co Ltd [1913] AC 781 (PC). In 1910, and before the writs were issued, the AIPA was amend......
-
Rights Review in the High Court and the Cultural Limits of Judicial Power
...Pty Ltd v Moorehead (1909) 8 CLR 330; Colonial Sugar Refining Co Ltd v A-G (Cth) (1912) 15 CLR 182; Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd v The King (1912) 15 CLR 65. 114 Galligan, Politics of the High Court, above n 8, 85–91. 115 Ibid 91. 116 Ibid 91–4, 97. 117 Engineers' Case (1920) 28 CLR 129, 152 (......
-
The Knox Court: Exposition Unnecessary
...H V Evatt, William Holman (1979)at116.4The King and Attorney-Generalofthe Commonwealth vAssociated Northern Collieries (1911) 14CLR 387; 15 CLR 65 (FC); 18 CLR 30 (PC).5Griffithwas,according to SirOwenDixon,"dominantanddecisive ...hejustfeltthatheknew;andthatwhatheknewwasright.": see (1964)......