Aubrey v R
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | [2017] HCA 18 |
| Year | 2017 |
| Date | 2017 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
12 cases
-
The Queen v A2; The Queen v Magennis; The Queen v Vaziri
... ... 142 We do not read the joint reasons in Aubrey v The Queen 174 to suggest the contrary. The question in Aubrey was whether grievous bodily harm may be inflicted upon another person by the reckless transmission of a sexual disease contrary to s 35(1)(b) of the Act. The provision can be traced to s 20 of the Offences against the Person ... ...
-
Bell Lawyers Pty Ltd v Pentelow
...v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2010) 241 CLR 539 at 549 [23]; [2010] HCA 42. 129 Aubrey v The Queen (2017) 260 CLR 305 at 323 [34]; [2017] HCA 18. 130 London Scottish Benefit Society v Chorley (1884) 12 QBD 452 at 458; London Scottish Benefit Society v Chorley (1884) 13 QBD 872 at 877–......
-
The Queen v A2; The Queen v Magennis; The Queen v Vaziri
... ... 142 We do not read the joint reasons in Aubrey v The Queen 174 to suggest the contrary. The question in Aubrey was whether grievous bodily harm may be inflicted upon another person by the reckless transmission of a sexual disease contrary to s 35(1)(b) of the Act. The provision can be traced to s 20 of the Offences against the Person ... ...
-
Aaron Joe Thomas Graham(Plaintiff) v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
... ... 65 Ex parte Professional Engineers' Association (1959) 107 CLR 208 at 267; [1959] HCA 47 ... 66 Yemshaw v Hounslow London Borough Council [2011] 1 WLR 433 at 442–443 [26]–[27]; [2011] 1 All ER 912 at 922–923; Owens v Owens [2017] 4 WLR 74 at [39]. Cf Aubrey v The Queen (2017) 91 ALJR 601 at 610–611 [29]–[30]; 343 ALR 538 at 547–548; [2017] HCA 18 ; R v G [2004] 1 AC 1034 at 1054 [29] ... 67 Pape v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2009) 238 CLR 1 at 145 [423]; [2009] HCA 23 ... 68 Eg Aid/Watch Inc v Federal Commissioner of ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
2018 Winterton Lecture: Constitutional interpretation
...constitutional words. In a famous passage in Royal College of Nursing of the 73 (1970) 123 CLR 327 at 333. 74 (2017) 91 ALJR 601; [2017] HCA 18. 75 (2017) 91 ALJR 601 at 610 [24]. 20 University of Western Australia Law Review Vol 45(1):1 United Kingdom v Department of Health and Social Secu......