Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Chau Chak Wing

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date02 August 2019
Neutral Citation[2019] FCAFC 125
Date02 August 2019
CourtFull Federal Court (Australia)
Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Chau Chak Wing [2019] FCAFC 125


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Chau Chak Wing [2019] FCAFC 125


Appeal from:

Wing v The Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2018] FCA 1340



File number:

NSD 1760 of 2018



Judges:

BESANKO, BROMWICH AND WHEELAHAN JJ



Date of judgment:

2 August 2019



Catchwords:

DEFAMATION – pleadings – common law justification – primary judge struck out variant meanings – David Syme & Co Ltd v Hore-Lacy – respondents’ imputations that there were reasonable grounds to believe not permissible variants of the applicant’s imputations – untenable pleading of justification for the purposes of adducing evidence in mitigation of damage disallowed – leave to appeal given – appeal dismissed.


PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to appeal primary judge’s decision to strike out common law justification and statutory truth defences – application for leave to appeal dismissal of application for leave to file amended defence – adequacy of particulars of defences – primary judge held particulars imprecise, embarrassing, conclusory, hearsay, could not support defence of truth – whether the meaning of an applicant’s pleaded imputation is a question of fact for trial – meaning of a pleaded imputation not a triable issue – leave to appeal given – appeal dismissed.



Legislation:

Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), Divisions 91 and 92

Defamation Act 2005 (NSW), 8, 25, 26, 30, 36

Defamation Act 2005 (Vic), 22

Defamation Act 1974 (NSW), 9, 9(2)

Defamation Act 1992 (NZ), 8(2)(a)

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), 37M, 37N

Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), 16.01(c), 16.02, 16.02(d), 16.03, 16.03(1), 16.06, 16.08, 16.41, 16.42, 16.43, 16.43(2), 39.32

Legal Profession Uniform Conduct (Barristers) Rules 2015, 64

Legal Profession Uniform Law Australian Solicitors’ Conduct Rules 2015, 21.3

National Security Legislation Amendment (Espionage and Foreign Interference) Act 2018 (Cth)

Parliamentary Privileges Act 1987 (Cth), 16(3), 16(3)(a)

Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), 14.30(2)(a)

Supreme Court Rules 2000 (Tas), 263B(2)(a)



Cases cited:

Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd v Philip Morris Inc (1981) 148 CLR 170

Advertiser-News Weekend Publishing Co Ltd v Manock [2005] SASC 82; (2005) 91 SASR 206

Allsop v Church of England Newspaper Ltd [1972] 2 QB 161

Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27; 239 CLR 175

APN New Zealand Ltd v Simunovich Fisheries Ltd [2009] NZSC 93; [2010] 1 NZLR 315

Associated Leisure Ltd v Associated Newspapers Ltd [1970] 2 QB 450

Associated Newspapers Ltd v Dingle [1964] AC 371

Atkinson v Fitzwalter [1987] 1 WLR 201

Barclay v Cox [1968] VR 664

Berezovsky v Forbes Inc [2001] EMLR 45

Broadcasting Corporation of New Zealand v Crush [1988] 2 NZLR 234

Brooks v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 1331

Burstein v Times Newspapers Ltd [2000] EWCA Civ 338; [2001] 1 WLR 579

CAL No 14 Pty Ltd v Motor Accidents Insurance Board [2009] HCA 47; (2009) 239 CLR 390

Chakravarti v Advertiser Newspapers Ltd (1996) 65 SASR 527

Chakravarti v Advertiser Newspapers Ltd [1998] HCA 37; 193 CLR 519

Chalmers v Shackell (1834) 6 Car & P 475; 172 ER 1326

Chamberlain v The Queen (No 2) (1984) 153 CLR 521

Channel Seven Adelaide Pty Ltd v Manock [2007] HCA 60; (2007) 232 CLR 245

Channel Seven Adelaide Pty Ltd v S, DJ [2006] SASC 10; 94 SASR 296

Charan v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2019] VSCA 36

Charleston v News Group Newspapers Ltd [1995] 2 AC 65

Chase v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 1772; [2003] EMLR 11

Cohen v Mirror Newspapers Ltd [1971] 1 NSWLR 623

Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Kojic [2016] FCAFC 186; 249 FCR 421

Consolidated Trust Co Ltd v Browne (1948) 49 SR (NSW) 86

Corby v Allen & Unwin Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 227

Crampton v Nugawela (1996) 41 NSWLR 176

Cruddas v Calvert [2015] EMLR 16

Cunliffe v Woods [2012] VSC 254

Cruise v Express Newspapers plc [1999] QB 931

Dare v Pulham (1982) 148 CLR 658

David Syme & Co Ltd v Hore-Lacy [2000] VSCA 24; 1 VR 667

DDSA Pharmaceuticals Ltd v Times Newspapers Ltd [1973] QB 21

Dhir v Saddler [2017] EWHC 3155 (QB); [2018] 4 WLR 1

Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Thomas [2016] VSCA 237; 53 VR 546

Drummoyne Municipal Council v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1990) 21 NSWLR 135

Fairfax Digital Australia & New Zealand Pty Ltd v Kazal (2018) 97 NSWLR 547

Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v Bateman [2015] NSWCA 154; 90 NSWLR 79

Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v Gayle [2019] NSWCA 172

Fallon v MGN Ltd [2006] EWHC 783

Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd [2007] HCA 22; 230 CLR 89

Faruqi v Latham [2018] FCA 1328

Favell v Queensland Newspapers Pty Ltd [2005] HCA 52; 221 ALR 186

Fenn v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2018] VSCA 166

Flood v Times Newspapers Ltd [2012] UKSC 11; [2012] 2 AC 273

Gacic v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 362

Gallagher v Destiny Publications Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] WASC 475

George v Rockett (1990) 170 CLR 104

Gerlach v Clifton Bricks Pty Ltd [2002] HCA 22; 209 CLR 478

Greek Herald Pty Ltd v Nikolopoulos (2002) 54 NSWLR 165

Gumina v Williams (No 2) (1990) 3 WAR 351

Gutnick v Dow Jones & Co Inc (No 4) [2004] VSC 138; 9 VR 369

Hadzel v De Waldorf (1970) 16 FLR 174

Harbour Radio Pty Ltd v Trad [2012] HCA 44; 247 CLR 31

Hanson-Young v Leyonhjelm [2018] FCA 1688

Hasler v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCA 266; 87 NSWLR 609

Hicks v Gregory (1904) 6 WALR 100

Hobbs v Tinling (CT) & Co Ltd [1929] 2 KB 1

Hockey v Fairfax Media [2015] FCA 652; 237 FCR 33

Hore-Lacy v Cleary [2007] VSCA 314; 18 VR 562

Hough v London Express Newspaper Ltd [1940] 2 KB 507

Howden v Truth & Sportsman Ltd (1937) 58 CLR 416

Howden v “Truth” and “Sportsman” Ltd (No. 2) (1938) 38 SR (NSW) 287

Hyams v Peterson [1991] 3 NZLR 648

In re the Will of F B Gilbert (Deceased) (1946) 46 SR (NSW) 318

John Fairfax & Sons Ltd v Foord (1988) 12 NSWLR 706

John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd v Zunter [2006] NSWCA 227

Jones v Pollard [1997] EMLR 233

Jones v Skelton [1963] 1 WLR 1362

Kerney v Optimus Holdings Pty Ltd [1976] VR 399

King v Lintrose Nominees Pty Ltd (2001) 4 VR 619

Kingsfield Holdings Pty Ltd v Sullivan Commercial Pty Ltd [2013] WASC 347

Lewis v Daily Telegraph [1964] AC 234

Lucas-Box v News Group Newspapers Ltd [1986] 1 WLR 147

Mickelberg v Hay [2006] WASC 285

Mirror Newspapers Ltd v Harrison (1982) 149 CLR 293

Moore v Mitchell (1886) 11 OR 420

Morosi v Mirror Newspapers Ltd [1977] 2 NSWLR 749

Nationwide News Pty Limited v Rush [2018] FCAFC 70

Pahuja v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] NSWSC 1074

Pamplin v Express Newspapers Ltd [1988] 1 WLR 116

Petritsis v Hellenic Herald Pty Ltd [1978] 2 NSWLR 174

Phelps v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 130

Polly Peck (Holdings) plc v Trelford [1986] QB 1000

Prager v Times Newspapers [1988] 1 WLR 77

Prichard v Krantz (1984) 37 SASR 379

Rakhimov v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2001] NSWSC 10

Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd v Chesterton [2009] HCA 16; 238 CLR 460

Rofe v Smith’s Newspapers Ltd (1924) 25 SR (NSW) 4

Rush v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 357; 359 ALR 473

...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
37 cases
  • Helmbright v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 15 June 2021
    ...FCA 358. Attorney-General (Cth) v Queensland [1990] FCA 358; 25 FCR 125 Australian Broadcasting Corporation and Others v Chau Chak Wing [2019] FCAFC 125; 271 FCR 632 Bodney v Bennell [2008] FCAFC 63; 167 FCR 84 Cherokee Nation v Georgia 30 US 1 Chetcuti v Commonwealth [2020] HCA 42; 95 ALJR......
  • Palmer v McGowan (No 5)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 2 August 2022
    ...[2014] FCAFC 15; (2014) 219 FCR 322 Austin v Mirror Newspapers Ltd [1986] AC 299 Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Chau Chak Wing [2019] FCAFC 125; (2019) 271 FCR 632 Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Comalco Ltd (1986) 12 FCR 510 Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O’Neill [2006]......
  • Nationwide News Pty Limited v Rush
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 2 July 2020
    ...6, 25, 28, 29, 34, 35, 36 Cases cited: Andrews v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd [1980] 2 NSWLR 225 Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Wing [2019] FCAFC 125; 371 ALR 545 Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Comalco Ltd (1986) 12 FCR 510 Australian Securities Commission v Marlborough Gold Mines ......
  • Gold Titan Pty Ltd v Lopez
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 5 August 2021
    ...570 Aon Risk Services Ltd v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27; (2009) 239 CLR 175 Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Wing [2019] FCAFC 125; (2019) 271 FCR 632 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets (Australia) Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 634; (2014) 317 ALR......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • The Reformulated Contextual Truth Defence: More Radical That First Appears
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 50-2, June 2022
    • 1 June 2022
    ...686–7 [53]–[54] (Charles JA).20. Ibid 686 [52] (Charles JA).21. Hore-Lacy (n 16); Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Chau Chak Wing (2019) 271 FCR 632. Cf West AustralianNewspapers Ltd v Elliott (2008) 37 WAR 387.Collins 209 I have long posited,22with the support of some distinguished ac......