Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Hassett

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeO'CALLAGHAN J
Judgment Date06 June 2019
Neutral Citation[2019] FCA 855
Date06 June 2019
CourtFederal Court
Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Hassett [2019] FCA 855

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Hassett [2019] FCA 855


File number:

TAD 21 of 2018



Judge:

O'CALLAGHAN J



Date of judgment:

6 June 2019



Catchwords:

INDUSTRIAL LAW – contraventions of ss 499 and 500 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – making of orders as to penalty



Legislation:

Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 499, 500, 556, 557



Cases cited:

Auimatagi v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner [2018] FCAFC 191; (2019) 363 ALR 246

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union (The Australian Paper Case) (No 2) [2017] FCA 367

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2019] FCA 468

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (The Bendigo Theatre Case) (No 2) [2018] FCA 1211

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (No 2) [2018] FCA 1968

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2017] FCA 1269

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (The Brooker Highway Case) [2018] FCA 1081

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (The Parliament Square Case) [2018] FCA 1080

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (The Quest Apartments Case) (No 2) [2018] FCA 163; (2018) 358 ALR 725

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (The Webb Dock Case) [2017] FCA 62

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (2017) 249 FCR 458

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cement Australia Pty Ltd (2017) 258 FCR 312

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 181; 340 ALR 25

Australian Ophthalmic Supplies Pty Ltd v McAlary-Smith (2008) 165 FCR 560

Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner (The Broadway on Ann Case) [2018] FCAFC 126

Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner (The Non-Indemnification Personal Payment Case) [2018] FCAFC 97; (2018) 280 IR 28

Director of Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2015] FCA 1213

Draffin v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2009] FCAFC 120; (2009) 189 IR 145

Parker v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner [2019] FCAFC 56

Transport Workers’ Union of Australia v Registered Organisations Commissioner (No 2) [2018] FCAFC 203



Date of hearing:

2 May 2019



Registry:

Tasmania



Division:

Fair Work Division



National Practice Area:

Employment & Industrial Relations



Category:

Catchwords



Number of paragraphs:

62



Counsel for the Applicant:

M Felman



Solicitor for the Applicant:

B Vallence of the Australian Building and Construction Commissioner



Counsel for the Respondents:

P Boncardo



Solicitor for the Respondents:

K Reid of the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union



ORDERS


TAD 21 of 2018

BETWEEN:

AUSTRALIAN BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION COMMISSIONER

Applicant


AND:

RICHARD HASSETT

First Respondent


KEVIN HARKINS

Second Respondent


CONSTRUCTION, FORESTRY, MARITIME, MINING AND ENERGY UNION

Third Respondent



JUDGE:

O'CALLAGHAN J

DATE OF ORDER:

6 june 2019



THE COURT DECLARES THAT:


  1. The First Respondent contravened section 499 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the FW Act) on 5 June 2017 at the Living City Civic Hub Project at 17 Fenton Way, Devonport (the Site) by failing to comply with a reasonable request by Fairbrother Pty Limited (Fairbrother), the Site occupier, to comply with an occupational health and safety requirement that applied to the Site.

  2. The First Respondent contravened section 500 of the FW Act on 5 June 2017 at the Site by acting in an improper manner while exercising, or seeking to exercise, rights in accordance with Part 3-4 of the FW Act, by a) climbing on the crane while it was in operation; b) ignoring Fairbrother’s reasonable requests to get off the crane; and c) using insulting language and engaging in abusive behaviour.

  3. The First Respondent contravened section 500 of the FW Act on 6 June 2017 at the Site by acting in an improper manner while exercising, or seeking to exercise, rights in accordance with Part 3-4 of the FW Act, by climbing on the crane while it was in operation causing crane work to stop.

  4. By reason of sections 793 and 550 of the FW Act, the Third Respondent contravened section 499 of the FW Act by the conduct of the First Respondent constituting the contravention the subject of the first declaration.

  5. By reason of sections 793 and 550 of the FW Act, the Third Respondent contravened section 500 of the FW Act by the conduct of the First Respondent constituting the contravention the subject of the second declaration.

  6. By reason of sections 793 and 550 of the FW Act, the Third Respondent contravened section 500 of the FW Act by the conduct of the First Respondent constituting the contravention the subject of the third declaration.

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

  1. The First Respondent pay to the Commonwealth of Australia a penalty of $8,000 in respect of his contravention of section 499 on 5 June 2017.

  2. The First Respondent pay to the Commonwealth of Australia a penalty of $8,000 in respect of his contravention of section 500 on 5 June 2017.

  3. The First Respondent pay to the Commonwealth of Australia a penalty of $6,000 in respect of his contravention of section 500 on 6 June 2017.

  4. The Third Respondent pay to the Commonwealth of Australia a penalty of $40,000 in respect of its contravention of section 499 on 5 June 2017.

  5. The Third Respondent pay to the Commonwealth of Australia a penalty of $40,000 in respect of its contravention of section 500 on 5 June 2017.

  6. The Third Respondent pay to the Commonwealth of Australia a penalty of $35,000 in respect of its contravention of section 500 on 6 June 2017.

  7. The pecuniary penalties referred to in orders 7 to 12 above be paid to the Commonwealth of Australia within 28 days of these orders being made by the Court.

  8. There be no order as to costs.

  9. The proceeding otherwise be dismissed.





Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
8 cases