Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Australia | 1-800-335-6202

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Camelot Derivatives Pty Ltd ((in Liquidation)); Camelot Derivatives Pty Ltd ((in Liquidation))

Cited authorities 21 Cited in 16 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation2012-0423 FCA A
Year2012
Date2012
CourtFederal Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
12 cases
  • Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Select AFSL Pty Ltd (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 8 July 2022
    ...(in liq) [2017] FCA 497; (2017) 348 ALR 525 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Camelot Derivatives Pty Ltd (in liq) [2012] FCA 414; (2012) 88 ACSR 206 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Cassimatis (No 8) [2016] FCA 1023; (2016) 336 ALR 209 Australian Securiti......
  • Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Commonwealth Bank of Australia
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 29 November 2022
    ...v Camelot Derivatives Pty Ltd (In Liquidation); In the Matter of Camelot Derivatives Pty Limited (In Liquidation) (2012) 88 ACSR 206; [2012] FCA 414 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Cassimatis (No 8) (2016) 336 ALR 209; [2016] FCA 1023 Australian Securities and Investments......
  • Australian Securities and Investments Commission v MLC Nominees Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 11 September 2020
    ...Commission v Camelot Derivatives Pty Limited (in Liquidation); In the matter of Camelot Derivatives Pty Limited (in Liquidation) [2012] FCA 414; 88 ACSR 206 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2018] FCA 155 Commonwealth of Australi......
  • Australian Securities and Investment Commission v Westpac Securities Administration Limited
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 28 October 2019
    ...Limited (In Liq) [2017] FCA 497; 348 ALR 525 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Camelot Derivatives Pty Ltd (in liq) [2012] FCA 414; 88 ACSR 206 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Cassimatis (No 8) [2016] FCA 1023; 336 ALR 209 Australian Securities and Invest......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries
  • Federal Court cracks down on misleading and deceptive conduct in financial services
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 4 August 2012
    ...and deceptive conduct. In the case of Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Camelot Derivatives Pty Limited (in Liq) [2012] FCA 414 (Camelot Derivatives) the court came down heavily on an unsuccessful options trader that was using the iron condor trading strategy to clock-up tr......
  • Efficiently, honestly and fairly - AFSL services
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 2 October 2019
    ...Ltd (in liq) [2017] FCA 497; Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Camelot Derivatives Pty Ltd (in liq) (2012) 88 ASCR 206; [2012] FCA 414 at page 225 and paragraph [69] per Foster J Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Westpac Banking Corporation (No 2) (2018) 35......
  • Misleading or deceptive conduct - a warning in difficult times for financial services providers
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 9 June 2012
    ...to clients. The recent decision of Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Camelot Derivatives Pty Limited (In Liquidation) [2012] FCA 414 highlights the potential for allegations of misleading or deceptive conduct to be raised against financial service Justice Foster's judgment ......
1 books & journal articles
  • Credit Advisers, Consumer Credit and Equitable Fiduciary Obligations
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 47-1, March 2019
    • 1 March 2019
    ...Further, ashighlighted by Foster J in Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Camelot Derivatives PtyLimited (in liq) [2012] FCA 414 [69] AFSL requirements may impose an obligation to act in a mannerwhich is ‘ethically sound’, which we argue may include compliance with equitable ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT