Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Narain
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judgment Date | 03 July 2008 |
| Neutral Citation | [2008] FCAFC 120 |
| Court | Full Federal Court (Australia) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Liability Hearing)
...engaged in by the individual in the course of a corporation’s affairs: Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) v Narain [2008] FCAFC 120; (2008) 169 FCR 211 (at 216–217 [19] per Finkelstein J; at 225 [98] per Jacobson and Gordon JJ); Houghton v Arms [2006] HCA 59; (2006) 225......
-
Stuart v Rabobank Australia Ltd
...Commission v Kobelt (2019) 267 CLR 1; [2019] HCA 18 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Narain (2008) 169 FCR 211; [2008] FCAFC 120 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v National Exchange Pty Ltd (2005) 148 FCR 132; [2005] FCAFC 226 Australian Securities and Inve......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
Personal Liability For Misleading Or Deceptive Public Announcements
...recent unanimous judgment of the Full Federal Court in Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Narain [2008] FCAFC 120: Highlights the importance of ensuring public statements are not misleading or deceptive. Provides guidance where company officers may be held personally liable ......
-
Directors' Personal Liability For Misleading And Deceptive Conduct In Relation To Shares
...in ASIC v Citrofresh International Ltd (2007) 164 FCR 333. The decision was appealed to the Full Federal Court in ASIC v Narain (2008) 66 ACSR 688 which had to consider two is the conduct of publishing a written statement made "in relation to" a financial product (shares) only if the statem......
1 books & journal articles
-
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v. MacDonald (No. 11): corporate governance lessons from James Hardie.
...n 8, 357-9, 362-72. (185) (2006) 59 ACSR 373, 399. Compare the approach in Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Narain (2008) 169 FCR 211, 217, where Finkelstein J held it was open for ASIC to prove a director's breach of s 180(1) for 'having caused [his company] to contravene......