Baker v Campbell

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1983-1026 HCA A,[1983] HCA 39
Date1983
Year1983
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
203 cases
3 firm's commentaries
  • Legal professional privilege - how far is the scope?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 11 April 2015
    ...Resources Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1999] HCA 67; (1999) 201 CLR 49; 168 ALR 123, at [35]. 2 Baker v Campbell (1983) 153 CLR 52; 49 ALR 385; 57 ALJR 3 Wheeler v Le Marchant (1881) 17 Ch D 675 at 685 per Cotton LJ. 4 Baker v Campbell (1983) 153 CLR 52; The Daniels Corporation I......
  • Accountants, lawyers and the privileged class: R v Special Commissioner of Income Tax
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 11 May 2013
    ...Can LPP be used to resist disclosure under section 263 & 264? Since 1983 and the High Court decision of Baker v Campbell (1983) 153 CLR 52, communications and documents properly the subject of LPP have not been available for inspection by the Commissioner under sections 263 and Further,......
  • Can ASIC Obtain Your Privileged Communications? — Implications of the James Hardie Bill
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 21 December 2004
    ...its application to judicial or quasi-judicial proceedings (Attorney General (NT) v Maurice (1986) 161 CLR 475 at 490; Baker v Campbell (1983) 153 CLR 52), this argument is no longer As to the second point above, at least two of the judges in the majority in Yuill considered that the existen......
6 books & journal articles
  • The Development of the High Court's Willingness to Overrule Common Law Precedent
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 45-2, June 2017
    • 1 June 2017
    ...Unusual for the time, Beaudesert provides an instance of the High Court formulating a novel doctrine: McHugh, above n 1, 47. 98 (1983) 153 CLR 52. 99 (1999) 201 CLR 49. 100 (2009) 239 CLR 175. 101 (1978) 141 CLR 88 (‘Viro’). 102 [1971] AC 814. This was an appeal to the Privy Council from Ja......
  • Disqualification of Judges and Pre-Judicial Advice
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 43-2, June 2015
    • 1 June 2015
    ...ER 618, 620; Charles Wolfram, Mod ern Legal Ethics (West Publishers, 1986) 243; Grant v Downs (1976) 135 CLR 674; Baker v Campbell (1983) 153 CLR 52. 136 Nine Films and Television Pty Ltd v Ninox Television Ltd Tamberlin J , quoted in Osland v Secretary to the Department of Justice (2008) 2......
  • Lawyers, confidentiality and whistleblowing: lessons from the McCabe tobacco litigation.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 40 No. 3, April - April 2017
    • 1 April 2017
    ...Who Intend to Harm Others' (1994) 47 Rutgers Law Review 81; Parker and Evans, above n 8, 97. (72) ASCR r 9. (73) Baker v Campbell (1983) 153 CLR 52. This means that, until legislated otherwise, the privilege may apply in all settings in which some authority purports to have power to require......
  • Human Rights in the High Court of Australia, 1976-2003: The Righting of Australian Law?
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 33-2, June 2005
    • 1 June 2005
    ...judicial proceedings); Sorby v Commonwealth (1983) 152 CLR 281 (Murphy J re: privilege against self- incrimination); Baker v Campbell (1983) 153 CLR 52 (Murphy J re: legal professional privilege); Police Service Board v Morris (1985) 156 CLR 397 (Murphy J re: privilege against incrimination......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT