Baker v Campbell
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | 1983-1026 HCA A,[1983] HCA 39 |
| Date | 1983 |
| Year | 1983 |
| Court | High Court |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
203 cases
3 firm's commentaries
-
Legal professional privilege - how far is the scope?
...Resources Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1999] HCA 67; (1999) 201 CLR 49; 168 ALR 123, at [35]. 2 Baker v Campbell (1983) 153 CLR 52; 49 ALR 385; 57 ALJR 3 Wheeler v Le Marchant (1881) 17 Ch D 675 at 685 per Cotton LJ. 4 Baker v Campbell (1983) 153 CLR 52; The Daniels Corporation I......
-
Can ASIC Obtain Your Privileged Communications? Implications of the James Hardie Bill
...its application to judicial or quasi-judicial proceedings (Attorney General (NT) v Maurice (1986) 161 CLR 475 at 490; Baker v Campbell (1983) 153 CLR 52), this argument is no longer As to the second point above, at least two of the judges in the majority in Yuill considered that the existen......
-
Accountants, lawyers and the privileged class: R v Special Commissioner of Income Tax
...Can LPP be used to resist disclosure under section 263 & 264? Since 1983 and the High Court decision of Baker v Campbell (1983) 153 CLR 52, communications and documents properly the subject of LPP have not been available for inspection by the Commissioner under sections 263 and Further,......
6 books & journal articles
-
The Development of the High Court's Willingness to Overrule Common Law Precedent
...Unusual for the time, Beaudesert provides an instance of the High Court formulating a novel doctrine: McHugh, above n 1, 47. 98 (1983) 153 CLR 52. 99 (1999) 201 CLR 49. 100 (2009) 239 CLR 175. 101 (1978) 141 CLR 88 (‘Viro’). 102 [1971] AC 814. This was an appeal to the Privy Council from Ja......
-
Disqualification of Judges and Pre-Judicial Advice
...ER 618, 620; Charles Wolfram, Mod ern Legal Ethics (West Publishers, 1986) 243; Grant v Downs (1976) 135 CLR 674; Baker v Campbell (1983) 153 CLR 52. 136 Nine Films and Television Pty Ltd v Ninox Television Ltd Tamberlin J , quoted in Osland v Secretary to the Department of Justice (2008) 2......
-
Lawyers, confidentiality and whistleblowing: lessons from the McCabe tobacco litigation.
...Who Intend to Harm Others' (1994) 47 Rutgers Law Review 81; Parker and Evans, above n 8, 97. (72) ASCR r 9. (73) Baker v Campbell (1983) 153 CLR 52. This means that, until legislated otherwise, the privilege may apply in all settings in which some authority purports to have power to require......
-
Human Rights in the High Court of Australia, 1976-2003: The Righting of Australian Law?
...judicial proceedings); Sorby v Commonwealth (1983) 152 CLR 281 (Murphy J re: privilege against self- incrimination); Baker v Campbell (1983) 153 CLR 52 (Murphy J re: legal professional privilege); Police Service Board v Morris (1985) 156 CLR 397 (Murphy J re: privilege against incrimination......
Get Started for Free