BBH v The Queen

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
JudgeFrench CJ.,Gummow J.,Hayne J.,Heydon J.,Crennan,Kiefel JJ.,Bell J.
Judgment Date28 March 2012
Neutral Citation2012-0328 HCA A,[2012] HCA 9
Docket NumberB76/2010
Date28 March 2012
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 cases
  • Patel v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 24 August 2012
    ...approved in R v Radley (1973) 58 Cr App R 394 at 403. 120 (1989) 168 CLR 266 at 274. 121 BBH v The Queen (2012) 86 ALJR 357 at 378 [94]; 286 ALR 89 at 114; [2012] HCA 122Davies v The King (1937) 57 CLR 170 at 180 per Latham CJ, Rich, Dixon, Evatt and McTiernan JJ; [1937] HCA 27. 123Nudd v T......
  • Robert Lindsay Hughes(Appellant) v The Queen
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 14 June 2017
    ...[2010] VSCA 135 at [26]–[27]. See also BBH v The Queen (2012) 245 CLR 499 at 525 [70]–[71] per Hayne J (Gummow J agreeing at 522 [61]); [2012] HCA 9. 136 CGL v Director of Public Prosecutions (2010) 24 VR 486 at 495 [30]–[31], 497 [38]; CEG v The Queen [2012] VSCA 55 at [14]; Reeves v The Q......
  • Bradley Douglas Cooper v The Queen
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 14 November 2012
    ...219 at 236. 40 See HML v The Queen (2008) 235 CLR 334 at 425 [274]; [2008] HCA 16; BBH v The Queen (2012) 86 ALJR 357 at 393–394 [194]; 286 ALR 89 at 135; [2012] HCA 41R v Rajakaruna (No 2) (2000) 15 VR 592 at 608 [53]. 42Consul Development Pty Ltd v DPC Estates Pty Ltd (1975) 132 CLR 373 a......
  • Marsh v The Queen
    • Australia
    • Court of Appeal of ACT
    • 29 November 2018
    ...Mr S Odgers SC and Mr G Walsh (Appellant) Mr S Drumgold (Respondent) Cases Cited: Bauer v The Queen (No 2) [2017] VSCA 176 BBH v The Queen [2012] HCA 9; 245 CLR 499 Dao v The Queen [2011] NSWCCA 63; 81 NSWLR 568 Edwards v The Queen (1993) 178 CLR 193 Festa v The Queen [2001] HCA 72; 208 CLR......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Assessing Significant Probative Value for the Purposes of Admitting Coincidence Evidence: DSJ v R; NS v R
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The Nbr. 17-2, January 2013
    • 1 January 2013
    ...AC 57 at 68, Lord Herschell. 3 For example, Queensland continues to apply the common law rules relating to such evidence:BBH v The Queen [2012] HCA 9, (2012) 245 CLR 499 at [50] [1894] AC 57. 5 [1975] AC 421. 6 [1991] 2 AC 447. 7 Ibid. at 465. See also R v Boardman [1975] AC 421. 8 [1995] H......
  • Resolving the Application of the Christie Discretion in the Uniform Evidence Legislation
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 42-3, September 2014
    • 1 September 2014
    ...Heydon, Cross on Evidence (LexisNexis, 9th ed, 2013) 373 [11125]. 56 R v Carusi (1997) 92 A Crim R 52, 65–6 (Hunt CJ at CL); BBH v R (2012) 286 ALR 89 [112] (Heydon J). 57 Festa v R (2001) 208 CLR 593 [51] (McHugh J). See also R v Cavkic (No 2) (2009) 28 VR 341 [47] (Vincent and Nettle JJA,......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT