Blunden v Commonwealth

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeGleeson CJ,Gummow,Hayne,Heydon JJ,Kirby J,Callinan J
Judgment Date10 December 2003
Neutral Citation[2003] HCA 73,2003-1210 HCA B
CourtHigh Court
Docket NumberC6/2003
Date10 December 2003
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
28 cases
  • Sweedman v Transport Accident Commission
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 9 March 2006
    ...force’ there. Submissions by South Australia and Western Australia to the contrary were correctly controverted by the appellant. 30Blunden v The Commonwealth (2003) 218 CLR 330 at 338–339 [16]–[18], 359–361 [91]–[97]. 31McGinty v Western Australia (1996) 186 CLR 140 at 168–169; APLA Ltd v L......
  • Bar Malaysia v Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2018
  • John Rizeq(Appellant) v The State of Western Australia
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 21 June 2017
    ...HCA 29. See also John Pfeiffer Pty Ltd v Rogerson (2000) 203 CLR 503 at 529–532 [50]–[58]; [2000] HCA 36; Blunden v The Commonwealth (2003) 218 CLR 330 at 338–339 [16]–[18], 359–360 [91]; [2003] HCA 73; Agtrack (NT) Pty Ltd v Hatfield (2005) 223 CLR 251 at 258 [8]–[11]; [2005] HCA 38; Sweed......
  • The "Sam Hawk"
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
  • Attributes and Attribution of State Courts — Federalism and the Kable Principle
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 40-1, March 2012
    • 1 March 2012
    ...whole. I t depends _____________________________________________________________________________________ 38 Blunden v Commonwealth (2003) 218 CLR 330. See also Graeme Hill, 'The Common Law and Federal Jurisdiction — What Exactly Does Section 80 of the Judiciary Act Do?' (2006) 34 Federal La......
  • The Centralisation of Judicial Power within the Australian Federal System
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 42-2, June 2014
    • 1 June 2014
    ...was achieved by turning first to s 80 to pick up choice of law rules, and then to s 79 only if necessary (See Blunden v Commonwealth (2003) 218 CLR 330, 338–9; Pfeiffer (2000) 203 CLR 503, 529–32). The High Court’s choice to sequence the application of ss 79 and 80 in this way was of great ......
  • The Common Law and Federal Jurisdiction — What Exactly Does Section 80 of the Judiciary Act DO?
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 34-1, March 2006
    • 1 March 2006
    ...effect' as s 79 in applying the NSW rules for the recognition and enforcement of extraterritorial rights arising from a civil wrong:. 2 (2003) 218 CLR 330 ('Blunden'). 3 Ibid 339 [18] (Gleeson CJ, Gummow, Hayne and Heydon JJ, with Callinan J agreeing). See also Justice W M C Gummow, 'The Co......
  • Choice of Law and the Australian Constitution: Locating the Debate
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 33-1, March 2005
    • 1 March 2005
    ...jurisdiction': ibid 531 [55] (emphasis added); see also at 563 [159] (Kirby J). Subsequently, in Blunden v Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 203 ALR 189 ('Blunden'), the joint judgment of Gleeson CJ, Gummow, Hayne and Callinan JJ emphasised that one turns first to s 80 and then to s 79 only ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT