Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Australia | 1-800-335-6202

Campbells Cash and Carry Pty Ltd v Fostif Pty Ltd

Judgment Cited authorities 124 Cited in 158 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
JudgeGleeson CJ,Gummow,Hayne,Crennan JJ,Kirby J,Callinan,Heydon JJ
Judgment Date30 August 2006
Neutral Citation[2006] HCA 41,2006-0830 HCA A
Docket NumberS514/2005 to S520/2005 Matter No S515/2005 Matter No S516/2005 Matter No S517/2005 Matter No S518/2005 Matter No S519/2005 Matter No S520/2005
Date30 August 2006
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
102 cases
5 firm's commentaries
  • Taking Up Arms For The Investor - FMA's Power To Litigate
    • New Zealand
    • Mondaq New Zealand
    • 23 September 2010
    ...(1996) 70 FCR 93; (1996) 138 ALR 655; (1996) 21 ACSR 332; (1996) 14 ACLC 1486 Ibid. Campbells Cash and Carry Pty Ltd v Fostif Pty Ltd (2006) 229 CLR 386; 229 ALR 58. The information in this article is for informative purposes only and should not be relied on as legal advice. Please contact ......
  • Australian Class Actions Update: Class Actions To Remain A Material Risk
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 21 November 2022
    ...litigation funding was consequently rejected by the High Court of Australia in Campbells Cash and Carry Pty Ltd v Fostif Pty Ltd (2006) 229 CLR 386. The abolition brings Western Australia in line with the other states and removes the torts as barriers to litigation The Bill does not seek to......
  • Liquidators And Funded Litigation - Is Court Approval Necessary?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 30 June 2008
    ...Australia calls into question the practicality of his suggestion. Background In Campbell's Cash & Carry Pty Ltd v Fostif Pty Ltd (2006) 80 ALJR 1441, the High Court held that funding is a reality of commercial life and that courts would look favourably on litigation funding arrangements......
  • Queensland Supreme Court confirms legality of litigation funding agreements in class actions
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 16 October 2019
    ...at [119], citing J C Scott Constructions v Mermaid Waters Tavern Pty Ltd [1984] 2 Qd R 413 regarding the position in Queensland. 6 (2006) 229 CLR 386. 7 Gladstone Ports Decision at [136] to 8 (2007) 158 FCR 417. 9 Ibid at [39] cited at Gladstone Ports Decision at [144]. 10 Gladstone Ports D......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
46 books & journal articles
  • Introduction
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review Nbr. 4-2, March 2008
    • 1 March 2008
    ...conduct. There are no comparable measures in place, however, to protect class 56 Campbells Cash & Carry Pty. Limited v. Fostif Pty. Ltd., [2006] HCA 41. 57 Nantais v. Teletronics Proprietary (Canada) Ltd. (1996), 28 O.R. (3d) 523 (Gen. Div.) [Nantais]; and Smith v. Canadian Tire Acceptance ......
  • Introduction
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review Nbr. 8-2, May 2013
    • 1 May 2013
    ...Estate v Ontario (AG), [2002] OJ No 3417 [McIntyre]; Glegg v Bromley, [1912] 3 KB 474 (CA); Campbell’s Cash & Carry Pty Ltd v Fostif Pty, [2006] HCA 41 [Fostif]. Legal Services Act (UK), 2007, c 29; Fostif, ibid; Arkin v Borchard Lines Ltd and Others, [2005] 1 WLR 3055 (CA of England and Wa......
  • Seeking Recognition of Canadian Class Action Judgments in Foreign Jurisdictions: Perils and Pitfalls
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review Nbr. 4-2, March 2008
    • 1 March 2008
    ...conduct. There are no comparable measures in place, however, to protect class 56 Campbells Cash & Carry Pty. Limited v. Fostif Pty. Ltd., [2006] HCA 41. 57 Nantais v. Teletronics Proprietary (Canada) Ltd. (1996), 28 O.R. (3d) 523 (Gen. Div.) [Nantais]; and Smith v. Canadian Tire Acceptance ......
  • Strategy for de Fendants Facing a Leave Motion to Commence a Class Act Ion Under the Securities Act
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review Nbr. 8-2, May 2013
    • 1 May 2013
    ...Estate v Ontario (AG), [2002] OJ No 3417 [McIntyre]; Glegg v Bromley, [1912] 3 KB 474 (CA); Campbell’s Cash & Carry Pty Ltd v Fostif Pty, [2006] HCA 41 [Fostif]. Legal Services Act (UK), 2007, c 29; Fostif, ibid; Arkin v Borchard Lines Ltd and Others, [2005] 1 WLR 3055 (CA of England and Wa......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT