Campbells Cash and Carry Pty Ltd v Fostif Pty Ltd
Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
Court | High Court |
Judge | Gleeson CJ,Gummow,Hayne,Crennan JJ,Kirby J,Callinan,Heydon JJ |
Judgment Date | 30 August 2006 |
Neutral Citation | [2006] HCA 41,2006-0830 HCA A |
Docket Number | S514/2005 to S520/2005 Matter No S515/2005 Matter No S516/2005 Matter No S517/2005 Matter No S518/2005 Matter No S519/2005 Matter No S520/2005 |
Date | 30 August 2006 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
100 cases
- Gurtler v Finance Now Pty Ltd
- Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu v Jp Morgan Portfolio Services Ltd
-
The Valetta Trust
...[2008] EWHC 526. Morris-v Southark London Borough Council (Law Society intervening) [2011] 2 All ER at 240. Campbells Cash and Carry Pty Limited -v- Fostif Pty Limited [2006] HCA 41. Civil Justice Council ‘The future funding of litigation – alternative funding structures’ June 2007. Sarum ......
- Callery v Gray (Nos 1 and 2)
Request a trial to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries
-
Taking Up Arms For The Investor - FMA's Power To Litigate
...(1996) 70 FCR 93; (1996) 138 ALR 655; (1996) 21 ACSR 332; (1996) 14 ACLC 1486 Ibid. Campbells Cash and Carry Pty Ltd v Fostif Pty Ltd (2006) 229 CLR 386; 229 ALR 58. The information in this article is for informative purposes only and should not be relied on as legal advice. Please contact ......
-
Liquidators And Funded Litigation - Is Court Approval Necessary?
...Australia calls into question the practicality of his suggestion. Background In Campbell's Cash & Carry Pty Ltd v Fostif Pty Ltd (2006) 80 ALJR 1441, the High Court held that funding is a reality of commercial life and that courts would look favourably on litigation funding arrangements......
-
Queensland Supreme Court confirms legality of litigation funding agreements in class actions
...at [119], citing J C Scott Constructions v Mermaid Waters Tavern Pty Ltd [1984] 2 Qd R 413 regarding the position in Queensland. 6 (2006) 229 CLR 386. 7 Gladstone Ports Decision at [136] to 8 (2007) 158 FCR 417. 9 Ibid at [39] cited at Gladstone Ports Decision at [144]. 10 Gladstone Ports D......
46 books & journal articles
-
Introduction
...conduct. There are no comparable measures in place, however, to protect class 56 Campbells Cash & Carry Pty. Limited v. Fostif Pty. Ltd., [2006] HCA 41. 57 Nantais v. Teletronics Proprietary (Canada) Ltd. (1996), 28 O.R. (3d) 523 (Gen. Div.) [Nantais]; and Smith v. Canadian Tire Acceptance ......
-
Introduction
...Estate v Ontario (AG), [2002] OJ No 3417 [McIntyre]; Glegg v Bromley, [1912] 3 KB 474 (CA); Campbell’s Cash & Carry Pty Ltd v Fostif Pty, [2006] HCA 41 [Fostif]. Legal Services Act (UK), 2007, c 29; Fostif, ibid; Arkin v Borchard Lines Ltd and Others, [2005] 1 WLR 3055 (CA of England and Wa......
-
Seeking Recognition of Canadian Class Action Judgments in Foreign Jurisdictions: Perils and Pitfalls
...conduct. There are no comparable measures in place, however, to protect class 56 Campbells Cash & Carry Pty. Limited v. Fostif Pty. Ltd., [2006] HCA 41. 57 Nantais v. Teletronics Proprietary (Canada) Ltd. (1996), 28 O.R. (3d) 523 (Gen. Div.) [Nantais]; and Smith v. Canadian Tire Acceptance ......
-
Strategy for de Fendants Facing a Leave Motion to Commence a Class Act Ion Under the Securities Act
...Estate v Ontario (AG), [2002] OJ No 3417 [McIntyre]; Glegg v Bromley, [1912] 3 KB 474 (CA); Campbell’s Cash & Carry Pty Ltd v Fostif Pty, [2006] HCA 41 [Fostif]. Legal Services Act (UK), 2007, c 29; Fostif, ibid; Arkin v Borchard Lines Ltd and Others, [2005] 1 WLR 3055 (CA of England and Wa......
Request a trial to view additional results