Campbells Cash and Carry Pty Ltd v Fostif Pty Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
JudgeGleeson CJ,Gummow,Hayne,Crennan JJ,Kirby J,Callinan,Heydon JJ
Judgment Date30 August 2006
Neutral Citation[2006] HCA 41,2006-0830 HCA A
Docket NumberS514/2005 to S520/2005 Matter No S515/2005 Matter No S516/2005 Matter No S517/2005 Matter No S518/2005 Matter No S519/2005 Matter No S520/2005
Date30 August 2006
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
100 cases
3 firm's commentaries
  • Taking Up Arms For The Investor - FMA's Power To Litigate
    • New Zealand
    • Mondaq New Zealand
    • 23 September 2010
    ...(1996) 70 FCR 93; (1996) 138 ALR 655; (1996) 21 ACSR 332; (1996) 14 ACLC 1486 Ibid. Campbells Cash and Carry Pty Ltd v Fostif Pty Ltd (2006) 229 CLR 386; 229 ALR 58. The information in this article is for informative purposes only and should not be relied on as legal advice. Please contact ......
  • Liquidators And Funded Litigation - Is Court Approval Necessary?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 30 June 2008
    ...Australia calls into question the practicality of his suggestion. Background In Campbell's Cash & Carry Pty Ltd v Fostif Pty Ltd (2006) 80 ALJR 1441, the High Court held that funding is a reality of commercial life and that courts would look favourably on litigation funding arrangements......
  • Queensland Supreme Court confirms legality of litigation funding agreements in class actions
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 16 October 2019
    ...at [119], citing J C Scott Constructions v Mermaid Waters Tavern Pty Ltd [1984] 2 Qd R 413 regarding the position in Queensland. 6 (2006) 229 CLR 386. 7 Gladstone Ports Decision at [136] to 8 (2007) 158 FCR 417. 9 Ibid at [39] cited at Gladstone Ports Decision at [144]. 10 Gladstone Ports D......
46 books & journal articles
  • Introduction
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review Nbr. 4-2, March 2008
    • 1 March 2008
    ...conduct. There are no comparable measures in place, however, to protect class 56 Campbells Cash & Carry Pty. Limited v. Fostif Pty. Ltd., [2006] HCA 41. 57 Nantais v. Teletronics Proprietary (Canada) Ltd. (1996), 28 O.R. (3d) 523 (Gen. Div.) [Nantais]; and Smith v. Canadian Tire Acceptance ......
  • Introduction
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review Nbr. 8-2, May 2013
    • 1 May 2013
    ...Estate v Ontario (AG), [2002] OJ No 3417 [McIntyre]; Glegg v Bromley, [1912] 3 KB 474 (CA); Campbell’s Cash & Carry Pty Ltd v Fostif Pty, [2006] HCA 41 [Fostif]. Legal Services Act (UK), 2007, c 29; Fostif, ibid; Arkin v Borchard Lines Ltd and Others, [2005] 1 WLR 3055 (CA of England and Wa......
  • Seeking Recognition of Canadian Class Action Judgments in Foreign Jurisdictions: Perils and Pitfalls
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review Nbr. 4-2, March 2008
    • 1 March 2008
    ...conduct. There are no comparable measures in place, however, to protect class 56 Campbells Cash & Carry Pty. Limited v. Fostif Pty. Ltd., [2006] HCA 41. 57 Nantais v. Teletronics Proprietary (Canada) Ltd. (1996), 28 O.R. (3d) 523 (Gen. Div.) [Nantais]; and Smith v. Canadian Tire Acceptance ......
  • Strategy for de Fendants Facing a Leave Motion to Commence a Class Act Ion Under the Securities Act
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review Nbr. 8-2, May 2013
    • 1 May 2013
    ...Estate v Ontario (AG), [2002] OJ No 3417 [McIntyre]; Glegg v Bromley, [1912] 3 KB 474 (CA); Campbell’s Cash & Carry Pty Ltd v Fostif Pty, [2006] HCA 41 [Fostif]. Legal Services Act (UK), 2007, c 29; Fostif, ibid; Arkin v Borchard Lines Ltd and Others, [2005] 1 WLR 3055 (CA of England and Wa......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT