Castel Electronics Pty Ltd v TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Company Ltd
Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
Neutral Citation | 2012-0123 FCA A |
Year | 2012 |
Date | 2012 |
Court | Federal Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Company Ltd v The Judges of the Federal Court of Australia
...is not binding upon the parties 106. Alternatively, it was submitted that such a term could be implied into every arbitration agreement. castel 69 Castel submitted that the source of the authority of an arbitral tribunal is the private agreement of the parties, not the State. Castel also ......
- Castel Electronics Pty Ltd v TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Company Ltd (No 2)
- Castel Electronics Pty Ltd v TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Company Ltd
3 firm's commentaries
-
Construction & Insfrastructure - What's News? - 1 February 2012
...Cases Castel Electronics Pty Ltd v TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd [2012] FCA 21 ARBITRATION – International Arbitration - Jurisdiction of Federal Court to enforce non-foreign Model Law awards under the International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth) – Effect of s 39B(1A)(c) of the Judiciar......
-
Federal Court considers jurisdiction to enforce international arbitral awards made in Australia
...Introduction TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v Castel Electronics Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 21, reasons handed down by a single judge of the Federal Court of Australia have confirmed that the Federal Court has jurisdiction to enforce international arbitral awards made in Australia. Parliame......
-
High Court settles heated constitutional challenge to international arbitration
...Australia intensifies attack on global transfer pricing Footnotes 1 Castel Electronics Pty Ltd v TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd [2012] FCA 21 2 Plaintiff's Submissions, TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v The Judges of the Federal Court of Australia and Anor, HCA Case No. s178 ......