Chamberlain v R
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judgment Date | 1984 |
| Neutral Citation | 1984-0222 HCA A,[1984] HCA 7 |
| Date | 1984 |
| Year | 1984 |
| Court | High Court |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
221 cases
-
Eastman v R
...the duty to set aside the verdict of a jury in a case where a miscarriage of justice has occurred. As was said by Gibbs CJ and Mason J in Chamberlain363: ‘The grant of a general appeal by s 24(1)(b) of the Federal Court of Australia Act was intended to enable the Full Court of the Federal C......
- Carr v R
- Steer v R
- Buchanan Turf Supplies Pty Ltd v Premier Turf Supplies Pty Ltd
Get Started for Free
8 books & journal articles
-
The Definition and Discovery of Facts in Native Title: The Historian's Contribution
...387–91; Farber, above n 167, 1025–7. 175 Note that some facts are 'indispensable intermediate facts': Chamberlain v The Queen (No 2) (1984) 153 CLR 521; Shepherd v The Queen (1990) 170 CLR 573. 322 Federal Law Review Volume 36 ________________________________________________________________......
-
Case Comments: Some judicial guidelines for establishing the value of immovable property in friendly sequestrations
...to the role of the expert (compare the discussion of the evidence given by Professor Cameron and Ms Kuhl in Chamberlain & another v R (1984) 51 ALR 225 (High Court of Australia) (the controversial prosecution of Mr and Mrs Chamberlain for murdering, and being an accessory after the fact of ......
-
Does Australia Need a Specific Institution to Correct Wrongful Convictions?
...essentially fails to meet the ‘unrea-sonable or not supportable on the evidence’ ground (Brennan, J, Chamberlain v TheQueen (no. 2) (1984) 153 CLR 521, p. 604). The provision was used in Easterday vThe Queen [2003] WASCA 69 (28 March 2003) where the prosecution failed todisclose all relevan......
-
The influence of Professor J.H. Wigmore on evidence law in Australia
...above n. 1 at 133.23. Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336.24. Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298.25. Chamberlain v R (1984) (No. 2) 153 CLR 521.26. Briginshaw, above n. 23, per Dixon J at 363; Jones v Dunkel, above n. 24, per Windeyer J [at 17]: ‘As Wigmore points (Evidence 3rd ed. (19......
Get Started for Free