Commonwealth v Kreglinger & Fernau Ltd and Bardsley

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[1926] HCA 8,1926-0420 HCA A
Date1926
Year1926
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
28 cases
  • Re Patterson; ex parte Taylor
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 6 September 2001
    ...by the people’ in ss 7 and 24 of the Constitution should be read as guaranteeing the right to vote to all adults and not only men. 70 (1926) 37 CLR 393 at 71Sue v Hill (1999) 199 CLR 462. 72 (1999) 199 CLR 462 at 496 [78]. Gaudron J also held that Mrs Hill was the subject of a foreign power......
  • Singh v Commonwealth of Australia
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 9 September 2004
    ...circumstances.’ At an earlier stage in the history of the federation, Isaacs J also recognised this point in The Commonwealth v Kreglinger & Fernau Ltd and Bardsley, when he said 64 that the Constitution was ‘made, not for a single occasion, but for the continued life and progress of the co......
  • Victoria v Australian Building Construction Employees' and Builders Labourers' Federation
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Felton v Mullingan
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
  • The Legal Personality of the Commonwealth of Australia
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 47-1, March 2019
    • 1 March 2019
    ...be different from the ‘state’in international law.59. Constitution preamble.60. Commonwealth v Kreglinger & Fernau Ltd and Bardsley (1926) 37 CLR 393, 413 (Isaacs J).61. See, eg, Nationwide News Pty Ltd v Wills (1992) 177 CLR 1, 69–70 (Deane and Toohey JJ); McCloy vNew South Wales (2015) 25......
  • Commonwealth Immunity as a Constitutional Implication
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 29-2, June 2001
    • 1 June 2001
    ...andresponsible government in the Constitution, see Lange (1997) 189 CLR 520, 557–559;Commonwealth v Kreglinger & Fernau Ltd (1926) 37 CLR 393, 411, 413 (Isaacs J);Commonwealth v Colonial Combing and Weaving Co Ltd ('The Wooltops Case') (1922) 31 CLR421; Gageler, above n 160, 181–190; Sawer,......
  • Heresy in the High Court? Federalism as a Constraint on Commonwealth Power
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 41-1, March 2013
    • 1 March 2013
    ...made this argument: Lindell, above n 3, 23. 100 The language of Isaacs J in The Commonwealth v Kreg linger & Fernau Ltd and Bardsley (1926) 37 CLR 393, 411–412 in relation to responsible government. 101 See also Allan and Aroney, above n 15. 102 Work Choices Case (2006) 229 CLR 1, 103–4 [14......
  • The legal structures of responsible government and ministerial responsibility.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 35 No. 3, December 2011
    • 1 December 2011
    ...v Colonial Combing, Spinning and Weaving Co Ltd (1922) 31 CLR 421, 448-51 (Isaacs J); Commonwealth v Kreglinger & Fernau Ltd (1926) 37 CLR 393, 411-15 (Isaacs J); Engineers' Case (1920) 28 CLR 129, 147 (Knox CJ, Isaacs, Rich and Starke JJ); New South Wales v Commonwealth (1915) 20 CLR 5......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT