Dr Martens Australia Pty Ltd v Bata Shoe Company of Australia Pty Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Court | Federal Court |
| Neutral Citation | 1997-0529 FCA A |
| Year | 1997 |
| Date | 1997 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
19 cases
- Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v D.A.P. Services (Kempsey) Pty Ltd (in Liquidation)
-
Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Limited (ACN 001 660 715) v D.A.P. Services (Kempsey) Pty Limited (in liquidation) (ACN 055 803 542)
...Pictures Industries Inc v Luckins (1996) 34 IPR 504 followed Dr Martens Australia Pty Limited v Bata Shoe Co of Australia Limited (1997) 75 FCR 230 cited Enzed Holdings Limited v Wynthea Pty Limited (1984) 57 ALR 167 considered General Tire and Rubber Co v Firestone Tyre and Rubber Co Limit......
- RCB Marketing Sdn Bhd v Milano Marketing Sdn Bhd
- Nokia Corporation v Mai
Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
-
What is an account of profits?
...v Eagle Homes Pty Ltd (No 3) (1996) 70 FCR 436 at 450 per Lindgren J, Dr Martens Australia Pty Ltd v Bata Shoe Co of Australia Pty Ltd (1997) 75 FCR 230 per Goldberg J, Norm Engineering v Digga Australia (No 3) (2007) 73 IPR 77, [2007] FCA 953 at [30] per Greenwood iii See, for example, Dar......
-
What is an account of profits?
...v Eagle Homes Pty Ltd (No 3) (1996) 70 FCR 436 at 450 per Lindgren J, Dr Martens Australia Pty Ltd v Bata Shoe Co of Australia Pty Ltd (1997) 75 FCR 230 per Goldberg J, Norm Engineering v Digga Australia (No 3) (2007) 73 IPR 77, [2007] FCA 953 at [30] per Greenwood iii See, for example, Dar......