Driscoll v R

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
Neutral Citation[1977] HCA 43,1977-0810 HCA C
Date1977
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
84 cases
  • Aytugrul v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 18 Abril 2012
    ...v The Queen 52 The appellant also claimed support for his argument about the meaning of ‘probative value’ in ss 135 and 137 from Driscoll v The Queen66. The appellant submitted that s 137 was based on what the Australian Law Reform Commission called a common law ‘discretion to exclude evide......
  • Osland v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Pedro Perara-Cathcart(Appellant) v The Queen
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 1 Marzo 2017
    ...90 See Thompson and Wran v The Queen (1968) 117 CLR 313 at 316–317 per Barwick CJ and Menzies J; [1968] HCA 21; Driscoll v The Queen (1977) 137 CLR 517 at 533 per Gibbs J (Mason J and Jacobs J agreeing at 543); [1977] HCA 43; Festa v The Queen (2001) 208 CLR 593 at 620–622 [86]–[92] per McH......
  • Australian Crime Commission v Stoddart
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 30 Noviembre 2011
    ...AC 545 . 62 R v Swaffield (1998) 192 CLR 159 at 191–193 [62]–[64]; [1998] HCA 1. 63 Driscoll v The Queen (1977) 137 CLR 517 at 541; [1977] HCA 43; Stephens v The Queen (1985) 156 CLR 664 at 669; [1985] HCA 64 CDJ v VAJ (1998) 197 CLR 172 at 215 [142] n 106 per McHugh, Gummow and Callinan JJ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
  • Public policy and private illegality in the pursuit of evidence
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 21-1-2, January 2017
    • 1 Enero 2017
    ...See, e.g., McDermott vThe King (1948) 76 CLR 501 at 513 (Dixon J); The King vLee (1950) 82 CLR 133 at 154 (Curia);Driscoll vThe Queen (1977) 137 CLR 517 at 541 (Gibbs J); Cleland vThe Queen (1982) 151 CLR 1 at 9 (Gibbs CJ), 18–19(Deane J), 30–33 (Dawson J); Stephens vThe Queen (1985) 156 CL......
  • Authenticating ‘Things’ in English Law: Principles for Adducing Tangible Evidence in Common Law Jury Trials
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 12-4, November 2008
    • 1 Noviembre 2008
    ...to have been bullied into writing out a confession invented by the police.233 Ajodha vState [1982] AC 204 at 218. Cp. Driscoll vR(1977) 137 CLR 517 at 541.234 ‘Onecan hardly envisage a case where the judge must decide that an accused was not responsiblefor the contents of the statement but ......
  • Resolving the Application of the Christie Discretion in the Uniform Evidence Legislation
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 42-3, September 2014
    • 1 Septiembre 2014
    ...102 (1950) 82 CLR 133 103 R v Lee (1950) 82 CLR 133, 134 (Latham CJ, McTiernan, Webb, Fullagar and Kitto JJ). 104 (1977) 137 CLR 517, 541. 105 [1987] 1 Qd R 239, 251. 106 [1996] 2 Qd R 68, 72. 107 Edmond, above n 99, 10, citing R v Lock (1997) 91 A Crim R 356, 364 (Hunt CJ at CL); R v Polki......
  • The Exercise of Police Powers in Queensland: The Defendant's Perspective
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Criminology (formerly Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology) No. 30-3, December 1997
    • 1 Diciembre 1997
    ...reject an allegedconfession if the judge considers it unfair to the accused person to allow suchaconfession into evidence (Driscoll v R (1977) 137 CLR 517).There is no obligation on police in Queensland, either at common law or inthe OPM, to inforrn a person that he or she may consult a sol......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT