Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Australia | 1-800-335-6202

Ex parte Walsh and Johnson; Re Yates

Cited authorities 21 Cited in 123 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1925-1218 HCA B,[1925] HCA 53
Date1925
Year1925
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
111 cases
  • Ex parte Williams
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • New South Wales v Commonwealth (No 1)
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Behrooz v Secretary of the Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 6 August 2004
    ...See also Jumbunna Coal Mine NL v Victorian Coal Miners' Association (1908) 6 CLR 309 at 364; Ex parte Walsh and Johnson; In re Yates (1925) 37 CLR 36 at 93; Attorney-General (Vict) v The Commonwealth (1945) 71 CLR 237 at 121 (1951) 83 CLR 1 at 258 (emphasis added). 122 (1951) 83 CLR 1 at 28......
  • Re Patterson; ex parte Taylor
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 6 September 2001
    ...that British subjects were not then aliens, see also Jerger v Pearce (1920) 27 CLR 526; Ex parte Walsh and Johnson; In re Yates (1925) 37 CLR 36 at 88 per Isaacs J, 117 per Higgins J, 132 per Starke J. 36 See Nolan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1988) 165 CLR 178 at 184 per ......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
10 books & journal articles
  • 'An "alien" by the barest of threads' - the legality of the deportation of long-term residents from Australia.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 33 No. 2, August 2009
    • 1 August 2009
    ...400 (Gummow, Hayne and Heydon JJ). (44) This is the way in which Knox CJ paraphrased the decision in Potter: Ex parte Walsh; Re Yates (1925) 37 CLR 36, 63 ('Ex parte Walsh'). His Honour goes on to quote directly from all the Justices in (45) (1925) 37 CLR 36, 64. This case concerned a secti......
  • Can Parliament Confer Plenary Executive Power? the Limitations Imposed by Sections 51 and 52 of the Australian Consitution
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 44-2, June 2016
    • 1 June 2016
    ...Ibid 121. The High Court has elsewhere stated that Parliament cannot abdicate its powers. See, eg, Ex parte Walsh & Johnson, In re Yates (1925) 37 CLR 36, 83, 107; Dignan’s Case (1931) 46 2016 Can Parliament Confer Plenary Executive Power? 299 _______________________________________________......
  • Involuntary Detention and the Separation of Judicial Power
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 35-1, March 2007
    • 1 March 2007
    ...164 CLR 261, 311 (Deane J); Australian Communist Party v Commonwealth (1951) 83 CLR 1 ('Communist Party Case'), 273 (Kitto J). 112 (1925) 37 CLR 36, 135, cited with approval in Communist Party Case (1951) 83 CLR 1, 269 (Fullagar J); Re Patterson; Ex parte Taylor (2001) 207 CLR 391, 443–4 [1......
  • Finding the Foothold: Freedom of Political Association in the Australian Constitution
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 47-2, June 2019
    • 1 June 2019
    ...Drugs to Prisoners: State of the Law and Beyond’(1990) 78 California Law Review 1243, 1269.22. Ex parte Walsh & Johnson, In re Yates (1925) 37 CLR 36, 79 (Isaacs J) (‘Ex parte Walsh’).23. Floyd, above n 21, 1269.24. Ex parte Walsh (1925) 37 CLR 36, 79 (Isaacs J).25. 357 US 449 (1958) (‘Patt......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT