Fontin v Katapodis
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | 1962-1210 HCA A,[1962] HCA 63 |
| Date | 1962 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
23 cases
-
Pritchard v Co-operative Group
...could amount to "provocation" so as reduce damages or extinguish the claim. Relying on a decision of the High Court of Australia, Fontin v Katapodis, 37 Lord Denning held that provocation by a claimant could properly be used to take away any element of aggravated or exemplary damages but it......
- Uren v John Fairfax & Sons Pty Ltd
-
Lucio Robert Paciocco and Another v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd
...1434 [148], 1466 [254], 1473 [291]; [2016] 2 All ER 519 at 537–538, 577–578, 608, 614–615. 282Fontin v Katapodis (1962) 108 CLR 177; [1962] HCA 63; Uren v John Fairfax & Sons Pty Ltd (1966) 117 CLR 118; [1962] HCA 40; XL Petroleum (NSW) Pty Ltd v Caltex Oil (Australia) Pty Ltd (1985) 155 CL......
- Hall v A & A Sheiban Pty Ltd
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF EXEMPLARY DAMAGES IN AUSTRALIA.
...3) 14 [40]-[43] (Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Gummow and Hayne JJ), 31-4 [92]-[98] (Kirby J), 50-1 [143] (Callinan J). (31) Fontin v Katapodis (1962) 108 CLR 177, 186-7 (Owen (32) XL Petroleum (n 4) 472 (Brennan J); Pollack v Volpato [1973] 1 NSWLR 653, 657-8 (Hutley JA) ('Pollack'). (33) XL Petrole......