Hastie Group Limited (in liq) v Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd (Formerly Brookfield Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd) (No 3)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date02 November 2022
Neutral Citation[2022] FCA 1280
Date02 November 2022
CourtFederal Court

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


Hastie Group Limited (in liq) v Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd (Formerly Brookfield Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd) (No 3) [2022] FCA 1280

File number:


VID 1277 of 2017VID 237 of 2022



Judgment of:

MIDDLETON J



Date of judgment:

2 November 2022



Catchwords:

BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY – action for debt brought by companies in liquidation and liquidator against numerous respondents – matters of principle common to various claims determined in this ‘liability trial’ – principles of collective enforcement and pari passu distribution – Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) Sch 2 s 90-15 – liquidator seeking various directions that he is justified and acting reasonably in the future conduct of the winding up of the companies – directions not to be made having regard to determination of matters of principle


CORPORATIONS – s 553C of Corporations Act – statutory set-off – whether parties have claims to which s 553C may apply – whether mutuality satisfied with respect to Deed of Cross-Guarantee – whether s 553C operates automatically without lodging of proofs of debt – held: s 553C operates automatically


CORPORATIONS – “bank guarantees” – autonomy principle – whether companies in liquidation have proprietary interests in proceeds of bank guarantees drawn down by respondents – whether drawdowns of bank guarantees voided by ss 437D or 468 of Corporations Act – whether respondents otherwise restrained from retaining bank guarantee proceeds – held: drawdowns of bank guarantees not voided and retention of proceeds not otherwise restrained


CORPORATIONS – winding up by the court – ss 459A and 467B of Corporations Act – application for order for winding up by the court where company already being wound up voluntarily – held: application refused


LIMITATION OF ACTIONS – whether applicants’ claims sufficiently pleaded by way of initial originating process and concise statement within limitation period – held: applicants’ claims sufficiently pleaded and not statute-barred if within limitation period



Legislation:

Corporate Law Reform Act 1993 (Cth)

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)

Corporations Regulations 2001 (Cth)

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)

Insolvency Practice Rules (Corporations) 2016 (Cth)

Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth)

Personal Property Securities Act 2009 (Cth)

Treasury Laws Amendment (2017 Enterprise Incentives No 2) Act 2017 (Cth)



Cases cited:

Arnold World Trading Pty Ltd v ACN 133 427 335 Pty Ltd[2010] NSWSC 1369; (2010) 80 ACSR 670

Australasian Conference Assoc Ltd v Mainline Constructions Pty Ltd (in liq) (1978) 141 CLR 335

Ayerst (Inspector of Taxes) v C & K (Construction) Ltd[1976] AC 167

Bass v Permanent Trustee Co Ltd(1999) 198 CLR 334

Brash Holdings Ltd (administrator appointed) v Katile Pty Ltd [1996] 1 VR 24

British Eagle International Airlines Ltd v Compagnie Nationale Air France [1975] 1 WLR 758

Caltex Oil (Australia) Pty Ltd v Best(1990) 170 CLR 516

Cambridge Gas Transportation Corp v Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Navigator Holdings plc[2007] 1 AC 508

Car Buyers Australia Pty Ltd v Australian Securities and Investments Commission[2020] FCA 599

Cargill International SA v Bangladesh Sugar and Food Industries Corp [1998] 1 WLR 461

Central Queensland Development Corporation Pty Ltd v Sunstruct Pty Ltd [2015] FCAFC 63; (2015) 231 FCR 17

Cinema Plus Ltd (admins apptd) v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (2000) 35 ACSR 1; [2000] NSWCA 195

Clough v Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd (No 3) [2007] FCA 8082

Commissioner of State Revenue (WA) v Placer Dome Inc (2018) 265 CLR 585

Commissioner of Taxation v Tull Reinforcing Pty Ltd (2006) 153 FCR 394

Commonwealth v Verwayen (1990) 170 CLR 394

Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering Co Ltd v INPEX Operations Australia Pty Ltd[2022] NSWSC 1125

Day & Dent Constructions Pty Ltd (in liq) v North Australian Properties Pty Ltd(1982) 150 CLR 85

Electricity Generation Corporation v Woodside Energy Ltd(2014) 251 CLR 640

Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Linter Textiles Australia Ltd (In liq)(2005) 220 CLR 592

Fletcher Construction Australia Ltd v Varnsdorf Pty Ltd [1998] 3 VR 812

Foley v Hill(1848) 2 HL Cas 28

Forge, citing International Air Transport Association v Ansett Australia Holdings Ltd(2008) 234 CLR 151

Foskett v McKeown[2001] 1 AC 102

Franklin's Selfserve Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation(1970) 125 CLR 52

Freedom Foods Pty Ltd v Blue Diamond Growers[2021] FCAFC 86; (2021) 286 FCR 437

General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125

Gye v McIntyre(1991) 171 CLR 609

Hamersley Iron Pty Ltd v Forge Group Power Pty Ltd (in liq) (receivers and managers appointed) [2017] WASC 152; (2017) 52 WAR 90

Hamersley Iron Pty Ltd v Forge Group Power Pty Ltd (in liq) (Receivers and Managers appointed) [2018] WASCA 163; (2018) 53 WAR 325

Hastie Group Limited (in liq) v Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd (Formerly Brookfield Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd)[2020] FCA 1824

Hayes (Liquidator) v 5G Developments Pty Ltd, in the matter of 5G Developments Pty Ltd[2019] FCA 1541

Hiley v The Peoples Prudential Insurance Company (in liq) (1938) 60 CLR 468

Hocking v Director-General of National Archives of Australia (2020) 379 ALR 395; [2020] HCA 19

In re Exchange Securities Ltd (in liq)[1988] Ch 46

International Air Transport Association v Ansett Australia Holdings Ltd(2008) 234 CLR 151

King v Patrick Projects Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 1110

Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd[1991] 2 AC 548

Lordianto v Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police (2019) 266 CLR 273

Lucas Stuart v Hemmes Hermitage Pty Ltd[2010] NSWCA 283

McDonald v Dennys Lascelles Ltd (1933) 48 CLR 457

McIntyre v Gye(1990) 22 FCR 260

Miller v Race(1758) 1 Burr 452

Morton as Liquidator of MJ Woodman Electrical Contractors Pty Ltd v Metal Manufactures Pty Limited[2021] FCAFC 228; (2021) 402 ALR 387

MS Fashions Ltd v Bank of Credit & Commerce International SA (in liq) (No 2)[1993] Ch 425

Old Style Confections Pty Ltd v Microbyte Investments Pty Ltd (in liq)[1995] 2 VR 457

Osborne Computer Corp Pty Ltd (admin apptd) v Airroad Distribution Pty Ltd(1995) 37 NSWLR 382

Re Carter (as liquidator of New Tel Ltd (in liq)) (2003) 44 ACSR 661; [2003] NSWSC 128

Re Force Corp Pty Ltd (in liq)[2020] NSWSC 1842; (2020) 149 ACSR 451

Re Green (as liq of Australian Resources Ltd (in liq)) (2004) 52 ACSR 452; [2004] NSWSC 1095

Re Jay-O-Bees Pty Ltd (in liq)[2004] NSWSC 818; (2004) 50 ACSR 565

Re Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (in administration)...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 cases
  • Hastie Group Limited (in liq) v Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd (Formerly Brookfield Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd) (No 4)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 22 December 2022
    ...53 WAR 325 Hastie Group Limited (in liq) v Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd (formerly Brookfield Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd) (No 3) [2022] FCA 1280 Hume v Munro (No 2) (1943) 67 CLR 461 Kadam v MiiResorts Group 1 Pty Ltd (No 4) (2017) 252 FCR 298; [2017] FCA 1139 McKellar v Container Te......
  • Tucker v State of Victoria
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 1 December 2022
    ...FCA 243 Hastie Group Limited (in liq) v Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd (Formerly Brookfield Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd) (No 3) [2022] FCA 1280 House v King (1936) 55 CLR 449 Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd v Esso Australia Ltd (2000) 104 FCR 564 Norbis v Norbis (1986) 161 CLR 513 Oswal v Burrup......