HM Attorney-General v B
| Jurisdiction | Tasmania |
| Judge | Underwood J,Slicer J,Blow J |
| Judgment Date | 11 September 2002 |
| Court | Supreme Court of Tasmania |
| Docket Number | CCA 32/2002 |
| Date | 11 September 2002 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Attorney-General for the State of Tasmania v McDonald, Kristian Clarence
...Ellis SC Respondent: M I Evans Aust Dig Criminal Law [1023] R v Harland-White 23/1997; R v Meers and Moles 32/1998; Attorney-General v B [2002] TASSC 63; R v Hayes (1987) 29 A Crim R 452; R v Allpass (1993) 72 A Crim R 561; R v Clarke [1996] 2 VR 520, referred to. Aust Dig Criminal Law [102......
-
DPP v M
...delay in making complaint, ‘the man came forward to protect the child of years ago’. Appellate cases such asAttorney-General v B[2002] TASSC 63 and Attorney-General v C[2003] TASSC 8 are not contradictory. Nor do they set parameters. The judicial response is evolutionary, not fixed by mathe......
-
DPP v T [Tascca]
...appeal, 6 years” imprisonment; R v England unreported A42/1989, also on a Crown appeal, 9 years” imprisonment; Attorney-General v B [2002] TASSC 63, also on a Crown appeal, 51/2 years” imprisonment; W, 1 March 2010, 12 years” imprisonment; KGB, 14 August 2009, 12 years” ...
-
DPP v Stu [TASCCA]
...considered should have been imposed at first instance due to double jeopardy, for exampleAttorney-General for the State of Tasmania v B [2002] TASSC 63 at par[25]; DPP v M (supra) at par[39], and Attorney-General for the State of Tasmania v C [2003] TASSC 8 pars[10] and [12]. The approach o......
Request a trial to view additional results