Jones v Commonwealth (No 1 & 2)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[1963] HCA 43,[1965] HCA 6,1963-1018 HCA A,1965-0203 HCA D
Date1963
Year1963
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
21 cases
  • Telstra Corporation Ltd v Hurstville City Council
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Minister for Arts Heritage v Peko-Wallsend Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 7 Septiembre 1987
    ... ... — Whether decision reviewable — World Heritage Properties Conservation Act 1983 (Commonwealth) — National Parks and Wildlife Conservation Amendment Act 1987 (Commonwealth) Treaties — ... Stage 1 of the park had already been added to the World Heritage List by the World Heritage Committee in ... ...
  • New South Wales v Commonwealth
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 14 Noviembre 2006
    ...(1953) 89 CLR 78 at 87; Australian Coastal Shipping Commission v O'Reilly (1962) 107 CLR 46 at 54–55; Jones v The Commonwealth [No 2] (1965) 112 CLR 206 at 218, 225–226, 236–237, 359 Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, (1833), vol 3, §1257. 351 (1908) 6 CLR 309 . 352 (190......
  • The Grain Pool of Wa v Commonwealth
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 23 Marzo 2000
    ...579 at 602. 13 (1994) 181 CLR 134 at 160. 14 cf, eg, R v Brislan; Ex parte Williams (1935) 54 CLR 262; Jones v The Commonwealth [No 2] (1965) 112 CLR 206. 15 (1908) 6 CLR 469. 16 (1908) 6 CLR 469 at 611. 17 (1908) 6 CLR 469 at 610. 18 (1908) 6 CLR 469 at 610. See also Lansell v Lansell (196......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • The Interpretation of Legal Terms Used in the Definition of Commonwealth Powers
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 35-2, June 2007
    • 1 Junio 2007
    ...term tends to be used in the cases, I shall adhere to it. 16 R v Brislan; Ex parte Williams (1935) 54 CLR 262; Jones v Commonwealth (1965) 112 CLR 206. The history and wording of this power invited such an approach to interpretation because it is probable that the words 'like services' were......
  • COSMOPOLITAN ORIGINALISM: REVISITING THE ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW IN CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 41 No. 1, August - August 2017
    • 1 Agosto 2017
    ...Constitution s 51(v). (49) R v Brislan; Ex parte Williams (1935) 54 CLR 262, 283-4 (Rich and Evatt JJ); Jones v Commonwealth [No 2] (1965) 112 CLR 206, 219 (Barwick CJ); The Herald and Weekly Times Ltd v Commonwealth (1966) 115 CLR 418, 432 (Kitto J), 438 (Taylor J), 439 (Menzies J); Willhe......
  • Constitutional Text, Authorial Intentions and Implied Rights: A Response to Allan and Arcioni
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 49-1, March 2021
    • 1 Marzo 2021
    ...(1947) 74 CLR 31.12. Allan (n 1) 31–2.13. Ibid 44–5.14. Ibid 33 (original emphasis).15. Jones v Commonwealth (No 2) (1965) 112 CLR 206.16. See J C Morris, ‘Some Aspects of the Commonwealth Parliament’s Defence Power Under the Constitution’ (1941) 53Res Judicatae 221.Crowe the term ‘marriage......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT