Koninklijke Philips Electronics N v V Remington Products Australia Pty Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | 1999-0618 FCA D,2000-0630 FCA C,1999-0906 FCA C |
| Year | 1997 |
| Date | 1997 |
| Court | Federal Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
48 cases
3 books & journal articles
-
The Intersection between Registered and Unregistered Trade Marks
...intention can be gleaned from the earlier Act: see generally Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Remington Products Australia Pty Ltd (2000) 100 FCR 90, 103 [15] (Burchett J)) or treated as evidence of Parliament's desire to achieve a different outcome in 1995 than under the superseded leg......
-
DISENTANGLING FUNCTIONALITY, DISTINCTIVENESS AND USE IN AUSTRALIAN TRADE MARK LAW.
...McEniery, 'Trade Marks for the Design and Layout of Retail Premises' (2014) 24(3) Australian Intellectual Property Journal 167. (61) (1999) 91 FCR 167 ('Philips v Remington (Trial)'). (62) Remington did not seek to raise the argument that the mere passage of the TMA (n 25) could not have se......
-
Reputation in Trade Mark Infringement: Why Some Courts Think it Matters and Why it Should Not
...unless it had at least some inherent distinctiveness. 30 Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Remington Products Australia Pty Ltd (1999) 91 FCR 167, 182-3. 2010 Reputation in Trade Mark Infringement 241 ____________________________________________________________________________________ re......