Kotsis v Kotsis

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1970-1224 HCA A,[1970] HCA 61
Date1970
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
36 cases
5 books & journal articles
  • The Centralisation of Judicial Power within the Australian Federal System
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 42-2, June 2014
    • 1 June 2014
    ...judicial po wer and state courts, those occasions are relatively few and their impact cannot to be overstated. 132 Kotsis v Kotsis (1970) 122 CLR 69; Knight v Knight (1971) 122 CLR 114. 133 (1982) 150 CLR 49 (‘Hospital Contribution Fund’). 134 Kotsis v Kotsis (1970) 122 CLR 69, 110. 135 (19......
  • Federal Constitutional Influences on State Judicial Review
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 39-3, September 2011
    • 1 September 2011
    ...State legislatures could blur judicial and other functions in a manner not permissible at the federal level. See, eg, Kotsis v Kotsis (1970) 122 CLR 69, 76 (Barwick CJ). See also City of Collingwood v Victoria (No 2) [1994] 1 VR 652, 662-4. In that case the Full Court of the Supreme Court o......
  • SEPARATION OF POWERS IN THE AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION:
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2017, December 2017
    • 1 December 2017
    ...Ltd(2008) 233 CLR 542 relating to the functions of the Takeovers Panel, held to be non-judicial and validly vested. 33Kotsis v Kotsis(1970) 122 CLR 69, applied in Knight v Knight(1971) 122 CLR 114. 34Commonwealth v Hospital Contribution Fund of Australia(1982) 150 CLR 49. 35Harris v Calladi......
  • Lecture - SINGAPORE ACADEMY OF LAW ANNUAL LECTURE 2019 — “JUDICIAL REVIEW IN AUSTRALIA: THE PROTECTION AND POWER OF COURTS UNDER THE AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION”
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2020, December 2020
    • 1 December 2020
    ...ss 71 and 77(iii). 112 Kable v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (1996) 189 CLR 51 at 139, per Gummow J. 113 Kotsis v Kotsis (1970) 122 CLR 69 at 91, per Windeyer J. 114 See, eg, R v Kirby, ex parte Boilermakers' Society of Australia (1956) 94 CLR 254 at 273–276, per Dixon CJ, McTiernan......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT