Leask v Commonwealth
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | 1996-1105 HCA A,[1996] HCA 29 |
| Year | 1996 |
| Date | 1996 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
45 cases
- Higgins v Commonwealth
-
The Law Association of Trinidad and Tobago v Dr. Keith Rowley the Prime Minister of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago
...powers and, for not dissimilar reasons, in the context of judicial review of subordinate legislation. (See Leask v Commonwealth (1996–7) 187 CLR 579 @ 593–5; 600; 612–5; 624; South Australia v Tanner (1989) 166 CLR 161 @ 165, 178; Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning v Rosemount Estates ......
-
S v Dodo
...is solely in the prerogative of the Legislature, and no judicial discretion need be given. See also Leask v Commonwealth of Australia (1996) 140 ALR 1 at 15. In Wynbyne v Marshall (1997) 117 NTR 11 (Sup Ct of the Northern Territory) at 26 it was assumed that there was a restriction on the a......
-
Monis v The Queen; Droudis v The Queen
...government for which the Constitution makes provision 258. Neither those decisions, nor Cunliffe v The Commonwealth259 and Leask v The Commonwealth260, which followed, explained how it might be determined whether a law which denied or restricted the implied freedom was invalid. The question......
Request a trial to view additional results
18 books & journal articles
-
Grounding the High Court's Modern Section 92 Jurisprudence: The case for Improper Purpose as the Touchstone
...92 context, 80 Kirk's account places most _____________________________________________________________________________________ 75 (1996) 187 CLR 579, 593–4 ('Leask'). 76 See, eg, Nationwide News Pty Ltd v Wills (1992) 177 CLR 1, 88–89 (Dawson J); Cunliffe v Commonwealth (1994) 182 CLR 272,......
-
Involuntary Detention and the Separation of Judicial Power
...of that passage: _____________________________________________________________________________________ 124 See Leask v Commonwealth (1996) 187 CLR 579, 591 (Brennan CJ), 600–4 (Dawson J), 613–16 (Toohey J, Gaudron J agreeing), 616–17 (McHugh J), 624 (Gummow J); cf 634–5 (Kirby J); Theophano......
-
Territory Courts and Federal Jurisdiction
...(Second Fringe Benefits Tax Case) (1987) 163 CLR 329, 353–4 (Mason CJ, Wilson, Dawson, Toohey and Gaudron JJ); Leask v The Commonwealth (1996) 187 CLR 579, 621–2 (Gummow J), 633 (Kirby J). 151 Lamshed v Lake (1958) 99 CLR 132, 143 (Dixon CJ); Spratt v Hermes (1965) 114 CLR 226, 278 (Windeye......
-
Can Parliament Confer Plenary Executive Power? the Limitations Imposed by Sections 51 and 52 of the Australian Consitution
...of Engineers v Adelaide Steamship Ltd (1920) 28 CLR 129, 151–2; Burton v Hogan (1952) 86 CLR 169, 179 (Dixon J); Leask v Commonwealth (1996) 187 CLR 579, 602 (Dawson J), 616 (McHugh J); Grain Pool (WA) v Commonwealth (2000) 202 CLR 479, 492 [16], 522–5 [111]–[118]; Work Choices Case (2006) ......
Request a trial to view additional results