Lipman v Clendinnen
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | [1932] HCA 24,1932-0721 HCA A |
| Date | 1932 |
| Year | 1932 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
-
Leichhardt Municipal Council v Montgomery
...4 Bing 628 at 641–642 per Best CJ, at 643–644 per Park J, at 645 per Burrough J [ 130 ER 911 at 916, 917, 917–918]; Lipman v Clendinnen (1932) 46 CLR 550 at 556, 568 per Dixon J; Commissioner for Railways (NSW) v Cardy (1960) 104 CLR 274 at 281–282, 286–287 per Dixon CJ, 300 per Fullagar J,......
- Papatonakis v Australian Telecommunications Commission
- Watson v George
- Commissioner for Railways (Nsw) v Cardy
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Case Note
...Tasmania Law Review 82 at 83. See also the views of Dixon J of the High Court of Australia in the 1932 decision of Lipman v Clendinnen(1932) 46 CLR 550. 18 Historically, the emphasis was on exclusive possession of the premises. See D C McDonald and L H Leigh, “The Law of Occupier's Liabilit......