Marshall v Watson

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1972-0424 HCA A,[1972] HCA 27
Year1972
Date1972
CourtHigh Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
20 cases
  • Christie v Neaves
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Taylor v Owners – Strata Plan No 11564 and Others
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 2 April 2014
    ...for Immigration and Citizenship v SZJGV (2009) 238 CLR 642 at 651–652 [9] per French CJ and Bell J; [2009] HCA 40. 67 Marshall v Watson (1972) 124 CLR 640 at 649 per Stephen J; [1972] HCA 68 Western Bank Ltd v Schindler [1977] Ch 1 at 18 per Scarman LJ cited by Lord Nicholls of Birkenhea......
  • Cooper Brookes (Wollongong) Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Ruddock v Taylor
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 8 September 2005
    ...[1971] VR 99 at 108; Mailau v Riordan [2001] ACTSC 13 at [28]. 34 Little v The Commonwealth (1947) 75 CLR 94 at 105; Marshall v Watson (1972) 124 CLR 640 at 643–644; Cowell v Corrective Services Commission (NSW) (1988) 13 NSWLR 714. 35 See, eg, Director of Public Prosecutions v Darby [2002]......
  • Get Started for Free