Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Australia | 1-800-335-6202

Melbourne Corporation v Barry

Cited authorities 15 Cited in 35 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[1922] HCA 56,1922-1215 HCA B
Date1922
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
27 cases
  • Zickar v Mgh Plastic Industries Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Smith v Western Australia
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 27 February 2013
    ...plainly said they think to be for the good rule and government of the municipality.’ Speaking of the same head of power 56 in Melbourne Corporation v Barry57, Isaacs J said 58: ‘It confers a power, not of extending the other powers, but of aiding them if need be or of making independent ord......
  • Electrolux Home Products Pty Ltd v Australian Workers' Union
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 2 September 2004
    ...Menzies J. 9 Bank of NSW v The Commonwealth (1948) 76 CLR 1 at 186 per Latham CJ. 10 See, for example, Melbourne Corporation v Barry (1922) 31 CLR 174 at 11Coco v The Queen (1994) 179 CLR 427 at 437; Plaintiff S157/2002v Commonwealth (2003) 211 CLR 476 at 492 [30]. 12Public Service Associat......
  • Momcilovic v The Queen
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 8 September 2011
    ...v The Progress Advertising and Press Agency Co Pty Ltd (1910) 10 CLR 457 at 464; [1910] HCA 28. 656 Melbourne Corporation v Barry (1922) 31 CLR 174 at 206; [1922] HCA 657 R v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Ex parte Simms [2000] 2 AC 115 at 130. 658 Daniels Corporation Interna......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • The common law principle of legality in the age of rights.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 35 No. 2, August 2011
    • 1 August 2011
    ...(Brennan J). (49) Evans v New South Wales (2008) 168 FCR 576, 595-6 (French, Branson and Stone JJ). (50) Melbourne Corporation v Barry (1922) 31 CLR 174, 199-201 (Isaacs (51) Saeed v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2010) 241 CLR 252, 271 (French CJ, Gummow, Hayne, Crennan and Kief......
  • Protest Before and During a Pandemic
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 50-4, December 2022
    • 1 December 2022
    ...and Still No Justice’,Green Left (Sydney, 13 February 2018) 8.125. Jackson (n 112) [86]–[87].126. See, eg, City of Melbourne v Barry (1922) 31 CLR 174, 208–9; Watson v Trenerry(1998) 122 NTR 1, 8; R v Roberts[2019] 1 WLR 2577, 2589 [37].434 Federal Law Review prohibition. Yet,when balancing......
  • Administrative Justice: Beyond the Courtroom Door
    • South Africa
    • Acta Juridica No. , August 2019
    • 15 August 2019
    ...Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh,108the High101Coco v The Queen (1994) 179 CLR 427.102Melbourne Corporation v Barry (1923) 31 CLR 174.103Sorby v Commonwealth (1983) 152 CLR 281.104Potter v Minihan (1908) 7 CLR 277.105Johnson v Director-General of Social Welfare (Vic) (1976......
  • Protest Before and During a Pandemic
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 50-4, December 2022
    • 1 December 2022
    ...and Still No Justice’,Green Left (Sydney, 13 February 2018) 8.125. Jackson (n 112) [86]–[87].126. See, eg, City of Melbourne v Barry (1922) 31 CLR 174, 208–9; Watson v Trenerry(1998) 122 NTR 1, 8; R v Roberts[2019] 1 WLR 2577, 2589 [37].434 Federal Law Review prohibition. Yet,when balancing......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT