Mickelberg v R
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | 1989-0630 HCA C,[1989] HCA 35 |
| Date | 1989 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
175 cases
- Cheney v R
-
Eastman v R
...It was objected to by the respondent. The primary ground of objection was that, upon the authority of the decision of this Court in Mickelberg v The Queen3, the Court had no power to receive the further evidence on an appeal, and that it would be futile to grant special leave to appeal on t......
- New Zealand v Johnston
- Mcneill v the Queen
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...Estate, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 339, [2009] SCC 51 ......................................... 94 Mickelberg v. he Queen (1989), 167 C.L.R. 259, [1989] HCA 35 ................ xx , 138, 139 –41 Milat v. he Queen, [2004] HCA 17 ................................................................................
-
THE KIRK STRUCTURAL CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATION.
...Burns (n 28) 357 [98] (Gageler J). (120) See, eg, Lindell (n 7) 429-30. (121) (1931) 46 CLR 73, 109. See also Mickelberg v The Queen (1989) 167 CLR 259, 269 (Mason CJ): 'by differentiating between original and appellate jurisdiction and by making different provisions for their exercise, Ch ......
-
Does Australia Need a Specific Institution to Correct Wrongful Convictions?
...using DNA evidence,suspended. PM – ABC Online. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2003/s922027.htmMickelberg v The Queen (1989) 167 CLR 259Milgard, J., & Lockyer, J. (2001). A submission of the Association in Defence of the Wrongly Convicted tothe Standing Committee on Justice ......
-
The Fame, Fortunes and Future of the ‘Rump of the Common Law’: Conspiracy to Defraud and Australian Law (Part 2)
...dimensions. SeetheHighCourtdecision inMickelberg vThe Queen(1988-1989)167 CLR 259; see also Mickelberg vThe Queen[1984) WAR 191; Mickelberg vThe Queen (1987) 29 A Crim R 442; Mickelberg vTheQueen(No.2)(1989) 4 WAR 497. Several appealshavearisenfromthesuccessfulprosecution oftheMickelberg br......