Miller v R; Smith v R; Presley v Director of Public Prosecutions (South Australia)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[2016] HCA 30
Date2016
Year2016
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
11 cases
  • The Queen v A2; The Queen v Magennis; The Queen v Vaziri
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 16 October 2019
    ... ... /2019 & S45/2019 HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA Statutes — Construction — Where s ... On appeal from the Supreme Court of New South Wales ... Representation D T Kell SC ... each matter (instructed by Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (NSW)) ... H K Dhanji SC ... The joint judgment in Grajewski v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) 81 adopted the ... 142 Miller v The Queen (2016) 259 CLR 380 at ... ...
  • The Queen v A2; The Queen v Magennis; The Queen v Vaziri
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 16 October 2019
    ... ... /2019 & S45/2019 HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA Statutes — Construction — Where s ... On appeal from the Supreme Court of New South Wales ... Representation D T Kell SC ... each matter (instructed by Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (NSW)) ... H K Dhanji SC ... The joint judgment in Grajewski v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) 81 adopted the ... 142 Miller v The Queen (2016) 259 CLR 380 at ... ...
  • IL v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 9 August 2017
    ... ... S270/2016 HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA Criminal law — Murder and ... On appeal from the Supreme Court of New South Wales ... Representation B J Rigg SC ... respondent (instructed by Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (NSW)) ... in McAuliffe 101 and more recently in Miller v The Queen 102 , which extends to crimes that, ... See also Director of Public Prosecutions v Beard [1920] AC 479 at ... See and compare Smith and Hogan, Criminal Law , 6th ed (1988) at ... ...
  • McKay v Bryant and Rhodes v Bryant
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court
    • 8 December 2017
    ... ... COURT OF THE NORTHERN TERRITORY OF AUSTRALIA AT DARWIN ... JUDGMENT OF: ... CLR 108 , MFA v R (2002) 213 CLR 606 , Miller v The Queen [2016] HCA 30 ; 90 ALJR 918 , ... JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM: JUDGE SMITH REASONS FOR JUDGMENT ... He appealed to the New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal and then to the ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT