Murphy v R
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | [1989] HCA 28,1989-0530 HCA A |
| Year | 1989 |
| Date | 1989 |
| Court | High Court |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
79 cases
1 firm's commentaries
-
Are the 'Recommendations' of Family Report Writers Admissible Evidence?
...and admissible. [1] see eg. Hollington v. F Hewthorn & Co [1943] KB 587 [2] see eg. Evidence Act 1995; section 55 [3] Murphy v. R (1989) 167 CLR 94 [4] (1999) 197 CLR 269 at [110] [5] [2008] FamCA 756 [6] ibid at [20] [7] ibid at [54] to [55] [8] (1996) 64 FCR 79 [9] ibid at [18] to [28......
10 books & journal articles
-
The Definition and Discovery of Facts in Native Title: The Historian's Contribution
...eg, Clark v Ryan (1960) 103 CLR 486, 491 (Dixon CJ); Weal v Bottom (1966) 40 ALJR 436, 438–9 (Barwick CJ), 442 (Taylor J); Murphy v R (1989) 167 CLR 94, 111 (Mason CJ and Toohey J), 130–1 (Dawson J); R v Bonython (1984) 38 SASR 45, 46–7 (King CJ); Osland v The Queen (1998) 197 CLR 316, 336 ......
-
The prisoners could not have that fair and impartial trial which justice demands': A fair criminal trial in 19th Century Australia
...admitted at the trial and not by reference to facts or alleged facts gathered from the media or some outside source”: Murphy v R (1989) 167 CLR 94 at 98–99 per Mason CJ and Toohey J. 41 Patterson v Colorado 205 US 454 (1907) at 462. The requirement that all evidence should be led and tested......
-
OPEN JUSTICE, 'BACK-TO-BACK' TRIALS AND JUROR PREJUDICE: EXAMINING THE SUPPRESSION ORDER IN THE TRIAL OF GEORGE PELL.
...(Mason CJ, Deane, Gaudron and McHugh JJ); Jago v District Court (NSW) (1989) 168 CLR 23, 56 (Deane J) ('Jago'). (63) Murphy v The Queen (1989) 167 CLR 94, 98-9 (Mason CJ and Toohey J) ('Murphy'); A-G v Times Newspapers Ltd [1974] AC 273, 309 (Lord (64) Pell (n 5) [47] (Kidd CJ). (65) See, e......
-
Expert Evidence of Delay in Complaint in Childhood Sexual Abuse Prosecutions
...of) v Smith [1931] SCR 672 at 684, SCC. Seealso, Abbey [1982] 2 SCR 24 at 42, SCC; Lavallée [1990] 1 SCR 852 at 896, SCC. 7 Murphy (1989) 167 CLR 94 at 110–13, 125–7, 130–1, HC Aust. 8 Evidence Acts 1995 (Cth, NSW) s. 80(b); Evidence Act 2001 (Tas) s. 80(b). 158 E & P CHILDHOOD SEXUAL ABUSE......
Get Started for Free