New South Wales v Amery

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeGleeson CJ,Gummow,Hayne,Crennan JJ,Kirby J,Callinan J,Heydon J
Judgment Date13 April 2006
Neutral Citation2006-0413 HCA A,[2006] HCA 14
CourtHigh Court
Docket NumberS288/2005
Date13 April 2006
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
15 cases
  • King v Jetstar Airways Pty Ltd (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Walker v Victoria
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • O'donoghue v Ireland; Zentai v Republic of Hungary; Williams v United States of America
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 23 April 2008
    ...v Commissioner of Police (2008) 82 ALJR 454 at 472 [82], 477 [111]; 242 ALR 191 at 212, 219; [2008] HCA 4; cf New South Wales v Amery (2006) 230 CLR 174 at 210 [120]; [2006] HCA 73 cf joint reasons at [42]. 74 See Williams v Minister for Justice and Customs (2007) 157 FCR 286. 75Vasiljkovic......
  • Ryan v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 16 February 2021
    ...Wales Aboriginal Land Council v Minister Administering the Crown Lands Act [2016] HCA 50; (2016) 260 CLR 232 New South Wales v Amery [2006] HCA 14; (2006) 230 CLR 174 Police Service of New South Wales v Honeysett [2001] NSWCA 452; (2001) 53 NSWLR 592 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadc......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
  • Sex Discrimination, Courts and Corporate Power
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 36-1, March 2008
    • 1 March 2008
    ...above n 7, 12–13. 11 Justice Michael Kirby of the High Court is a notable exemplar. See, eg, his comments in New South Wales v Amery (2006) 226 ALR 196 ('Amery'). 12 Balfour v Balfour [1919] 2 KB 571 represents a clear judicial statement of the classic position. See also Jeff Weintraub and ......
  • AN EVALUATION OF THE MECHANISMS DESIGNED TO PROMOTE SUBSTANTIVE EQUALITY IN THE EQUAL OPPORTUNITY ACT 2010 (VIC).
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 44 No. 2, December 2020
    • 1 December 2020
    ...Proof and Inferences of Racial Discrimination in Employment' (2003) 25(4) Sydney Law Review 535, 539. (67) New South Wales v Amery (2006) 230 CLR 174, 200-2 [86]-[91] (Kirby J) ('Amery'). For a discussion of this problem at the federal level, see Beth Gaze, 'The Costs of Equal Opportunity' ......
  • Balancing religious freedom and anti-discrimination: Christian Youth Camps Ltd. v. Cobaw Community Health Services Ltd.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 40 No. 2, January 2017
    • 1 January 2017
    ...Australian Anti-Discrimination Law (Federation Press, 2nd ed, 2014) 35. (5) See especially IW v City of Perth (1997) 191 CLR 1, 52. (6) (2006) 230 CLR 174, 200 (7) Ibid 200-1 [87]-[89]. (8) EOA 2010 s 3(a). (9) Sandra Fredman, Discrimination Law (Oxford University Press, 2nd ed, 2011) 34, q......
  • The collective dimension of federal anti-discrimination proceedings in Australia
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Discrimination and the Law No. 18-1, March 2018
    • 1 March 2018
    ...to a confidential mediation settlement (Durbach, 1995).Similarly to Banovic, the well-known Amery case (New South Wales v Amery [2006]230 CLR 174), which challenged the practices adopted by the New South Wales Depart-ment of Education and Training in setting the pay scales of the State’s pe......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT