Norbis v Norbis
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | 1986-0430 HCA A,[1986] HCA 17 |
| Year | 1986 |
| Date | 1986 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
346 cases
- Apple Inc. v Samsung Electronics Company Ltd
- Territory Realty Pty Ltd v Garraway
- Lambley v DP World Sydney Ltd
- Kelleners v Department of Social Security
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Family Law Accountants Update - Assessing contributions
...than an asset-by-asset basis. Perhaps the clearest statement of this preference came from the 1986 High Court case of Norbis v Norbis (1986) 161 CLR 513. Significantly, the High Court considered that neither alternative was inherently more just or equitable than the other. For instance, Jus......
3 books & journal articles
-
Constitutional Law and the Limits of Discretion in Family Property Law
...provided that a judge, a cting as persona designata, did not need to provide any reasons for his or her decisions was invalid by 61 (1986) 161 CLR 513, 519-520 (‘Norbis’). 62 Wong v R (2001) 207 CLR 584. 63 Norbis (1986) 161 CLR 513, a t 537; see also Wilson and Dawson JJ at 533. Brennan J’......
-
JUST VERSUS QUICK: CONSTRUCTIVIST AND ECOLOGICAL RATIONALITY IN A COMMON LAW SYSTEM.
...Sir Frank Kitto, 'Why Write Judgments?' (1992) 66(12) Australian Law Journal 787, 790. (56) Ibid 796. (57) Ibid. (58) Norbis v Norbis (1986) 161 CLR 513, 518-19 (Mason and Deane JJ); Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW (2018) 264 CLR 541, 555-6 [30]-[31] (Gageler (59) Jus......
-
APPEALS FROM DISCRETIONS, SATISFACTIONS AND VALUE JUDGMENTS: REVIEWING THE HOUSE RULES.
...and law before the tribunal. (7) For example, the requirement that decisions be made in good faith and for a proper purpose. (81986) 161 CLR 513, 518-19 (Mason and Deane JJcitations omitted). See also the description of a discretionary decision, and the need for the court on appeal to exerc......