Norbis v Norbis
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Court | High Court |
| Neutral Citation | 1986-0430 HCA A,[1986] HCA 17 |
| Date | 1986 |
| Year | 1986 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
352 cases
1 firm's commentaries
-
Family Law Accountants Update - Assessing contributions
...than an asset-by-asset basis. Perhaps the clearest statement of this preference came from the 1986 High Court case of Norbis v Norbis (1986) 161 CLR 513. Significantly, the High Court considered that neither alternative was inherently more just or equitable than the other. For instance, Jus......
2 books & journal articles
-
Constitutional Law and the Limits of Discretion in Family Property Law
...provided that a judge, a cting as persona designata, did not need to provide any reasons for his or her decisions was invalid by 61 (1986) 161 CLR 513, 519-520 (‘Norbis’). 62 Wong v R (2001) 207 CLR 584. 63 Norbis (1986) 161 CLR 513, a t 537; see also Wilson and Dawson JJ at 533. Brennan J’......
-
JUST VERSUS QUICK: CONSTRUCTIVIST AND ECOLOGICAL RATIONALITY IN A COMMON LAW SYSTEM.
...Sir Frank Kitto, 'Why Write Judgments?' (1992) 66(12) Australian Law Journal 787, 790. (56) Ibid 796. (57) Ibid. (58) Norbis v Norbis (1986) 161 CLR 513, 518-19 (Mason and Deane JJ); Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW (2018) 264 CLR 541, 555-6 [30]-[31] (Gageler (59) Jus......