North v Marra Developments Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1981-1209 HCA A,[1981] HCA 68
Date1981
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
25 cases
  • Asic v Soust
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Donald v Asic
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Braysich v The Queen
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 11 Mayo 2011
    ...s 998(6) and what it means to create a false or misleading appearance of active trading in securities on a stock market. 114 In North v Marra Developments Ltd99 Mason J said of a provision of a New South Wales statute framed in similar terms to s 998(1) 100 that: ‘The section seeks to ensur......
  • Australian Prudential Regulation Authority v Holloway
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Market manipulation – a suspect form of human ingenuity
    • New Zealand
    • Mondaq New Zealand
    • 7 Agosto 2013
    ...1Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v JM [2013] HCA 30. 2Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s1041B. 3North v Marra Developments Ltd [1981] HCA 68; (1981) 148 CLR 4Both a corner and a squeeze involve attempts to manipulate futures prices by manipulating supply and demand for the physical commod......
3 books & journal articles
  • Securities and Financial Services Regulation
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2021, December 2021
    • 1 Diciembre 2021
    ...2021). 101 Public Prosecutor v Wong Leon Keat [2021] SGDC 53 at [34]. 102 [2011] 1 SLR 348. 103 See North v Marra Developments Ltd (1981) 148 CLR 42, which involved s 70 of the New South Wales Securities Industry Act 1970 which was similar to s 97 of the Securities Industry Act (Cap 289, 19......
  • An Analysis of Market Manipulation under the Securities Services Act 36 of 2004 (Part 1)
    • South Africa
    • South Africa Mercantile Law Journal No. , May 2019
    • 25 Mayo 2019
    ...with art 11 of the Directive, the Financial ServicesAuthority has been designated as the single administrative regulator to ensure37(1981) 148 CLR 42 (HC Aus).38At 59.39The EU Market Abuse Directive repealed and replaced the Insider Dealing Directive No89/592/EEC (Official J L334 of 18 Nov ......
  • Protecting 'the Investing and Usually Naïve Public': The Securities Act of Jamaica
    • Jamaica
    • Risky Business: Perspectives on Corporate Misconduct Part Two
    • 21 Julio 2010
    ...1999, p. 162.54. Blacks Law Dictionary 8th (2004). RISKY BUSINESS: Perspectives on Corporate Misconduct32855. Baxt et al., p. 479.56. 148 C.L.R. 42.57. [1892] 2 Q.B. 724 .58. Supra, note 2.59. How Chih Lee, How Chih, ‘Market Manipulation in US and UK Part 1’, Comp. Law 1993 14 (5) 84–89, 84......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT